Lets Hear It For Bias!
So what? asks a minister about the medias preconceptions.
by Dr. L. Joseph Rosas III
ny public figure who has received more than the desired amount
or kind of coverage from the media has quickly complained about
bias: the apparent preference for bad news over good, the negative
and cynical interpretation of facts, the judging and misconstruing
of ones motives, a bentness to some hidden agenda of the media
elites.
Recently the Memphis Ministers Association hosted a roundtable
discussion with Kim Hindrew of WMC-TV Channel 5; Jackson Baker
of the Flyer, and David Waters of The Commercial Appeal. The focus
of the discussion was this alleged media bias, particularly in
the coverage of our bailiwick: religion.
With the usual disclaimers about prejudice against religion, the
problems of dealing with complex issues in a soundbite-driven
medium, and the lack of real news on the religious front, the
panel basically agreed: There is no such thing as a truly unbiased
media.
Nor should there be. One cannot be a detached observer of life.
We are all trapped in a lived existence. There is no neutral vantage
point from which we can interpret life. Even Joe Friday (Just
the facts, maam) had to do some interpretation.
At a local level, the recent media coverage over the annexation/incorporation
debate illustrates the challenge of unbiased interpretation. In
the national media much has been made of the charges, counter-charges,
and subsequent reversal regarding the White House role in granting
special clearance for burial in Arlington Cemetery.
Some in media were ready to believe the worst and others equally
willing to defend the White House illustrating the fact that
all news reporting involves interpretation. Fair interpretation
involves acknowledging ones own personal baggage, background,
biases, and sympathies. The media, like the rest of us, must acknowledge
their biases.
This does not mean that all truth is merely a matter of interpretation.
But it does remind us that The Truth, The Whole Truth, And Nothing
But The Truth is more difficult to obtain than we like to think.
Indeed, in most instances all we can hope for is truth beyond
any reasonable doubt.
The myth of modernity is that if all people of sound mind could
simply rationally observe the same phenomenon, we would be in
agreement on the fundamental issues of life. While science the
apex of modernity can make the world a neighborhood, it cannot
make humankind act like a family.
Neither science nor religion can offer absolute certitude. Faith
is a fundamental prerequisite to daily life. Post-modern culture
glories in a diversity of thought and expression that reminds
us that no one has an absolute corner on the truth.
In a democratic society we need the multitude of interepreters
(including the media) that provide the raw material for our own
individual reflections on life. Is the media biased? Yes! Arent
we all? We would not want it any other way.
Bias is another word for passion, commitment, or faith. Socrates
said that the unexamined life is not worth living. All we can
hope for is the careful scrutiny of all facets of our lives. The
truth is not some abstract proposition to be held in mundane belief;
the truth is ultimately a relationship with God that sets us free.
n
(Dr. L. Joseph Rosas III is pastor of Union Avenue Baptist Church
and president of the Memphis Ministers Association.)
This Week's Issue | Home