Broadhead, your clumsy attempts to discredit actual conservative opinion is noted, and will be reported to you know who.
Man, what a flashback. I saw The Caucasian Pioneers AND The Weekend Vodka Stash on a double bill back at The Agora Ballroom in Dallas. What a night. Dollar pitchers of beer and a fistful of quaaludes. In fact, I just woke up from that night. What year is this? Has anyone heard the new Warren Zevon album? Is he on tour to support it?
Caucasian pioneers that used guns to TAKE about everything they needed, but they were not criminals, raiders, Marxist Communist or Union soldiers with Sherman?
A market hunter or squatter may "take" some game with his gun but is a long way from "about everything" they needed so that would be a fools reply.
Who sounds more like they have been in the weekend vodka stash?
Again, not the Jews. And way too long an epithet, remember?
But you might want to check with B_Head.
Protocols of the Elders of Zion!
Who's with me?
Ern, think not so hard.
B-Head, calling Caucasian pioneers criminals further reveals your Stalinist duplicity. I had you spotted some time back in fractured attempts to appear conservative. I'm sure you and your comrades sit back, plastered on vodka, howling at your charade. Your English is very good, but your use of our language reveals a thin facade. Хватит!
I already said "criminals" CL.
Your ancestors were criminals, Union soldiers or trainers for community organizers from Chicago (better known as "mob enforcers")?
No, not jews.
I don't think so. No. Try harder.
"Progressive Marxist Democrat and community organizer"
B_head, your imaginary invective is getting way too long. How about settling on one word, say one or two syllables. C'mon you know you wanna.
Meanwhile dust up on socialist theory, and US history. My ancestors took about everything they needed with guns.
I can't believe anyone thinks this guy had a piece of his own body cut out, a literal pound of flesh, in order to "claim the spotlight." That's got to be one of the most cynical and pessimistic things I've ever heard. There is nothing wrong with him using his public stature to bring more attention to the National Kidney Registry. Given the shortages the program is facing, it would be irresponsible not to.
CL, you continue to amaze me with your silly typical progressive logic.
When you associate guns with intimidation, you are thinking like a criminal. If you associate guns with defending your RIGHTS, your freedoms or your wellbeing and safety of your family, you are thinking more like a responsible American citizen and gun owner.
When you confuse your RIGHTS with sufficient criminal intimidation to get what you want to retain political power, you are thinking more like a Progressive Marxist Democrat and community organizer.
If it makes him happy, good for him. But the implication that becoming a living organ donor is something more people should do because it is moral is pious nonsense, in my opinion. There's nothing bad or selfish about keeping what God gave you. And there are a number of good reasons for avoiding surgical procedures unless you're in dire straits. A botched diagnostic procedure and the misery that followed it convinced me of that years ago. Some doctors presume a moral authority that doesn't rightly belong to their profession.
I knew several Easons as I was growing up.
"Don't much care for his politics, but my hat's off to the man for this noble deed!"
My question is, does he not know that he is hated among many East Memphians. Many people think he is doing this because he is anti muni and not favored to win a majority in any election.
What do you guys think about this question?
So if I have a sufficient number of guns, I can force my employer to stay in the US, and shoot my way into a hospital to get my child that operation. Right On!
Word on the street is Medtronics is sending another 100 people home to 99 weeks unemployment so they can outsource their work to India. Obamacare maybe? More part time being used now that boosts the unemployment rate by 1/10 %. Obamacare maybe?
A solution to what? To the past legislation designed to need more solutions in the future when they fail to produce positive results other than needing MORE TAXES to finance from smaller payrolls and less American industry and labor?
The solution is to LIMIT what the federal government can implement that requires more government to institute for the sake of government growth.
Gee B_head, just what part of the Marxist dialectic included a Wall Street bailout?
You're either being argumentative for the fun of it, or you've been completely brainwashed... take your pick.
Even if you limit your argument to gun control only, both parties have proven to be inept at taking any serious or meaningful steps towards a solution of any type.
And one last thing, if you do not find the inference to armed rebellion by a currently seated member of congress to be disturbing, than you are more than hopeless.
By Louis Goggans
download this issue
click here to see more »