Ah. You don't like what Trump says so that is reason enough to boycott?
I understand that point if it were you or me that were boycotting. But Steve is elected Congressman who was elected to do the best job he could for the 9th District. I don't live there, but if he were my Congressman, I would be asking how boycotting, and doing so in the press, benefits the 9th District.
One of the things Trump has been saying, which presumably is something you agree with, is that the nation needs to repair its inner cities.
My guess is that the 9th District might not be at top of the list.
"The Left has forgotten who they even are," then they are not the Left. I think the Klobuchar Amendment vote shows pretty much who is and who ain't; at least who ain't.
Lil' Stevie, always keepin' it classy in the 9th & for the peeps. GoodGerman
Interesting take, FUNKbrs. I agree with the false dilemma argument by the way.
@CL - Clearly you are correct that no foot stomping or giant WaPo puppets have even a modicum of effect on that constituency. More and more polarization. More and more hate. More and more spew. Just read the comments!
Both sides are indulging every fetish.
And proving Putin's assertions about the failure of Americans to endorse a real democratic process. Those who lost will challenge the legitimacy of the election, if they don't get the results they want. It would have happened with a victory for either side. Emotions have an inertia like that.
The Left has forgotten who they even are, so I doubt they are going to have the resolve to dig into anything more substantial than scoring points with their constituency for the next re-election bid, CL.
Leave it to the few level-headed wonks left hanging around in DC to keep things running. The rest of them are arranging for the next hyperbolic media event to prop up their numbers.
Foot stomping, back turning, even giant puppets and drum circles will have no effect on Trump and his fan club. I think his blathering is not a sussing out, but mental diarrhea to which we must become accustomed and thankful since he and his'n certainly won't be sneaking up on us.
Right now the Left has the opportunity to dig in suss out our weaknesses while there is the resolve born of a good beating. Immediately I'm thinking of the 13 Democrats who voted against Klobuchar Amdt. No. 178. And of the 12 Republicans who voted their convictions, without whom Cohen and the rest may as well not bother showing up for the inauguration and the congressional term.
@datGuy - Empty seats show what people think of you? Hmmm...
@Nick - Which word? He's said a lot of things, then changed his mind. I think half his strategy is simply to say outrageous things, in order to make his opponents blow their top. Then he figures out who his enemies are, marks his opponents for later attention, and walks back enough to satisfy his core constituency. In this way, he's sussed out the lay of the land.
Oh, and peaceful transitions of power ARE normal in America. This one will be no different. Unless the Left decides to stomp its feet and throw more tantrums.
Some things don't even need to be said. The empty free seats will speak volumes.
There is no more effective strategy for a narcissistic man than simply ignoring him.
ArlingtonPop, not if you take Trump at his word.
Thanks Kevin, good reading and a noteworthy and accurate account of the continued problems of race relations in this country.
Peaceful transitions of power after elections, as the Constitution requires, are not normal?
Bravo! Thank you Congressman for standing with Mr. Lewis and others who proclaim: This is not normal.
Let's not forget the very beginning of how we got Trump.
Jeb Bush ran an attempt to become Bush III, and crush all opposition that operated by traditional means. He was very much a "NEVER" candidate for the Left and moderates within the Republican Party. No traditional Republican could stand in his path.
Republicans shouted "GIVE US THE TRUMP!" with the same nihilistic venom normally associated with the phrase "GIVE US BARABBAS!". They knew full well they were throwing their party's chances of success down a ravine, but preferred another 4 years of democratic presidency than Jeb.
Hillary would have stomped the brakes off Jeb, and would had a close run against Kasich.
Hillary used the exact same techniques Jeb used against Trump in the Primary, but the Ron Paul Revolution hadn't occurred in the Democratic Primary yet and Hillary was allowed to successfully manipulate the primary, which in the good old days would have been considered a display of political acumen.
But not in the post Ron Paul era. Ron Paul could have beaten Obama, and the backlash of Primary reform in the wake of the Obama victory made Trump unstoppable. The Democrats should have learned their lesson the easy way and enacted their own post Ron Paul Revolution reforms....
But they didn't, because Hillary had been waiting her turn after giving Obama a pass, and she needed the game to remain playable so she could play it.
At this point the "GIVE US BARABBAS!" argument of nihilistic rejection of the political process had gained more strength, not lost it. The average voter was tired of having their options dictated from above, and only given blue and red options for two basically identical candidates. The age of the classical logical fallacy of the false dilemma was over.
The information age is an age of transparency. We no longer falsely assume politician's are clean because they successfully do their dirt in secret. This is why no amount of scandal will shake the Trump presidency. We're numb to it.
The Republicans know what the Democrats need to learn; the other foot connected to the one on the back of your neck will be firmly planted in local soil. Success at the state and local level has all the real reigns of control over society. The Federal Government is a policing agency for local government, and every body hates being told what to do. Putting an idiot in the white house makes perfect sense when you realize president is a sheriff, and most people are outlaws.
I don't understand this "slots" thing.
Cops have been running buskers out of downtown for "Not properly portraying the blues tradition" since at least the 70's.
This is why we don't have buskers. Not because people don't want to busk, but that they don't want to risk being hassled by the cops for the small money busking provides.
Which raises the question of what these "slots" are about. If busking were legal, there would no apportionment of busking licenses, and then nu-speaking the word "slots" to hide the fact that somehow busking had been made illegal by oppressive unnecessary policies.
Why are there only 50 slots? Who decides who gets a slot, and who doesn't? Will the slots be filled by people who actually plan on subsisting off money earned from busking, or from musicians from other places trying to earn their Memphis merit badge?
Why can't people from the city that invented Rock and Roll play their music in the the street as loud as they want to? Any body who complains about music has no business living in Memphis to begin with.
I find Harold Junior's point of view refreshing at worst and tremendously encouraging at best. I watch him primarily on "Morning Joe", and would not describe his outlook there as consistently conservative. He seems to be as neutral as the rest of us, when it comes to making such judgments. Those folks for whom every utterance, every speculation has to be couched in liberal or conservative terms or its validity is suspect are curious folks indeed. They could live in my neighborhood, but I doubt that anyone would pay attention to them. Carry on, Junior! You can carry my petard into any fray without declaring your allegiance... RobtheElder
Toby, Thanks for the great article. I do hate to say that your headline is wrong- the Zoo's new lot (if they use 10'x20' spaces) will be about 11.4 acres. and 1.14 acres of that are specifically due to the over-sized parking spaces.
I agree with Eric Gottleib's corrections, and I ask that the Flyer publish them, and also to make sure that the online version is correct. I do want to add this detail- the 415 additional spaces add 3.32 acres to the parking lot (if the spaces were to remain 9'x19').
Regarding the Zoo and the OPC "splitting the cost evenly", again the article was incorrect, and Eric was correct. The Zoo and OPC agreed to split the cost, but no specific percentage was agreed to. I note however that the Zoo is almost 20 tomes larger than the OPC (based on budget size, number of employees, and dollars received in fund-raising). It would be very unreasonable to expect the OPC to contribute any amount close to what the Zoo could contribute. Also note that the OPC will be "contributing" land to the Zoo's parking lot, and the value of that land should be included in the OPC's "contribution" amount.
Regarding Tina Sullivan's statement that she would be willing to push the project's completion date, and what she was told that "shrinking the space sizes would require another vote by the council, a process that would take a least six weeks". I note that the July 19 resolution was written and passed on the same day, and in fact the 10'x20' requirement was added to the resolution in the Council's Executive Session at the very last moment before the resolution was approved in that session. So obviously, the Council could do it in one day if they wanted to, and certainly the details point to the fact that making the change is well justified.
Regarding the comment that "changing the plan at this point would probably add cost to the project", Eric Gottleib again made useful comments- 1) grading and paving the additional land required by the 10'x20' spaces would be much more than the additional planning cost, and 2) the larger land space of a lot with 10'x20' spaces would increase stormwater runoff with the associated costs to the neighborhood and Lick Creek.
I repeat Scott Banbury's comment, that my detailed analysis which Toby referred to can be found at- http://bit.ly/2i2s3M4
Thanks to all for their comments- I'm always impressed when people can pay attention to so many information sources. The Flyer I think is the best local "traditional media" source, but we can excuse them for their minor errors, especially if they correct them.
25! Of course I've never been to Jack London Square sober.
@CL - According to the article, they were sidestepping the freight, and didn't look for the Amtrak coming on an opposing, separate track at about 25 MPH. Even at 25 though, a train hits you, you are gonna feel it. Hope they recover fully. Though at his age, Yoshi's may be the last gig he plays.
As I remember, trains travel about 5 mph past Yoshis and thru Jack London Square so.... I think they may have been doing what musicians stepping outside of clubs have been doing for generations.
But still dammit.
download this issue
click here to see more »