He knew what JMJ stood for due to previous letters he had recieved from the subject. The prosecution failed to present any evidence proving his guilt. further more it doesn't appear they even tried. I find it very unlikly that he did this himself. They state that the barbed wire did not leave any deep cuts. I have become accidently entangled in barbed while while hunting several years ago. My injuries where pretty much superficial too, but very uncomfortable. And why would he add the chemical to make it hurt even worse. There's no way this man did this. Also remember, innocent until proven guilty. I belief this man's reputation has been damaged by these accusations. What an unjustice. All because somebody "thinks" he is guilty. But the prosecuter was unable to prove it. I think the man is due an apology, and should be reinstated to his position.
He knew what JMJ meant from previous letters he had recieved from this subject.
By Leonard Gill
download this issue
click here to see more »