<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Peeved Wharton, &amp;#8216;Re-assessing&amp;#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5
    
      by Jackson Baker</title>
      <link>http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Rss.xml?oid=1626403&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Peeved Wharton, &amp;#8216;Re-assessing&amp;#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5
    
      by Jackson Baker</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Memphis Flyer. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Memphis Flyer readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Memphis Flyer.</copyright>
      <webMaster>wil@desert.net (Memphis Flyer Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:00:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:30:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1627678]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1627678]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Tseneau]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[As already mentioned, the arrogance of power. It increasingly seems that he feels that reality is supposed to bend itself to suit his perceptions, not the other way around.<br>
<br>
  Remember his 'national crime fighting seminars' a few months back where he announced that he was going to suspend the Constitution on several counts?<br>
<br>
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1166665">UppityCholo</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:03:43 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1627623]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1627623]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[nicety]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Tseneau, More and more like Herenton how?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1627187">nicety</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:28:08 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1627545]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1627545]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Tseneau]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Of course Wharton is acting more and moer like Herenton. <br>
<br>
  A shame not enough people will realize that until *after* the election, when the same old things keep occuring.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1166665">UppityCholo</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:23:59 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1627189]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1627189]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[nicety]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Everyone I spoke to about the debate afterwards thought it was a JOKE! It was great entertainment until you realized it was an actual precursor to the election of our next mayor- then it got scary!
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1627187">nicety</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:31:45 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626853]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626853]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[memphismorris]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[One of Wharton's best leadership qualities is his humility. We certainly don't need any more arrogance in city hall.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          memphismorris]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:35:39 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626826]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626826]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Phlo]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The reason I'm concerned about AC has nothing to do with any of this. I heard the guy refer to himself in the third person a couple of nights ago.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1503103">Phlo</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:05:42 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626775]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626775]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[zebra]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'm kinda concerned about A.C. at this point. Channel 5 management surely caved into pressure from Atty. Ballin, but who wouldn't with ad revenues down in this economy?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1556218">zebra</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:06:54 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626664]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626664]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Jackson Baker]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Mute, the error was mine, not Tammy's. That's how I heard A C's remark and it's what I asked her about.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1167204">Jackson Baker</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:48:32 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626661]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626661]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Wintermute]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[From the version of this story that went out via RSS, it appears that Tammy didn't know the difference between "having" an office and "holding" an office:<br>
<br>
and specifically refuted his statement that candidates wishing to qualify for last week’s TV debate had been required “to hold an office.”<br>
<br>
got changed to:<br>
<br>
and she said there were no breaches of the rules for participation.<br>
<br>
Or maybe Tammy's comments were misquoted or mischaracterized.<br>
<br>
I'd interpret "the candidate has campaign headquarters" to mean office space in a commercial building, not just the living room in someone's residence, although I've had candidates win out of such handily. Especially under the circumstances of 28 candidates, it needed to have meant that.<br>
<br>
In my opinion, the TV station chickened out.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1164489">Wintermute</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:28:21 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Peeved Wharton, &#8216;Re-assessing&#8217; Future Debates, Claims Rules Were Changed by Channel 5]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626480]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.memphisflyer.com/JacksonBaker/archives/2009/09/04/peeved-wharton-re-assessing-future-debates-claims-rules-were-changed-by-channel-5/#1626480]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[LeftWingCracker]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Is he afraid of Mongo, for heaven's sake? Look, there's 28 people in the race and the station knows that legally, they have no grounds to block Mongo.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Profile?oid=1164510">LeftWingCracker</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:18:39 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.memphisflyer.com">Memphis Flyer</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



