http://www.memphisflyer.com/MemphisGaydar/archives/2009/11/06/local-legislators-and-students-discuss-state-hate-crimes-law Comments On: Local Legislators and Students Discuss State Hate Crimes Law by Bianca Phillips en-us Copyright 2013 Memphis Flyer. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Memphis Flyer readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Memphis Flyer. wil@desert.net (Memphis Flyer Webmaster) Sun, 26 May 2013 00:00:01 -0500 Sun, 26 May 2013 00:00:00 -0500 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by Packrat]]> Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:14:26 -0600 Memphis Flyer
Nobody is questioning that you can win any argument by the simple expedient of making things up and refusing to admit it... you've proven that you can win that childish game with the best of them, time and time again.

The question is why?
Posted by UppityCholo]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:29:15 -0600 Memphis Flyer http://www.nysm.nysed.gov/IroquoisVillage/…
Nothing you say can be presumed truthful."

This is the absolute source for truth? Laughable.
Posted by CHG]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:30:00 -0600 Memphis Flyer
Proving that you are lying isn't name calling. My responses debunking you on the issues you mentioned are a matter of record.
Posted by UppityCholo]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:19:23 -0600 Memphis Flyer
You are quoting from an evolutionary museum ideology. The museum in my city holds to evolution when you examine the exhibits.
Posted by CHG]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:13:19 -0600 Memphis Flyer
Once again, you are dodging the topics I just mentioned. Resorting to name calling and no solid responses.
Posted by CHG]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:53:45 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by Packrat]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:56:04 -0600 Memphis Flyer
And yet the record clearly shows you have made evasive or dishonest replies to some of them them... how did you do that if you never saw them?
Posted by UppityCholo]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:21:23 -0600 Memphis Flyer
Your original assertion was about all Indian tribes displaced by settlers and you claimed that 'the Native Americans' had no lands to be taken because they did not live in villages, they were nomadic.

When proven wrong, you tried to assert that you were only talking about a handful of tribes from the Northeast and yet you continue to bring up the Southwestern Navajo as your proof, while pretending that village dwellers like the Iroquois simply didn't exist.

http://www.nysm.nysed.gov/IroquoisVillage/…

Nothing you say can be presumed truthful.

Posted by UppityCholo]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:13:54 -0600 Memphis Flyer
You require responses, yet you never answer me. I have asked repeatedly where you derive morals from, how you account for logic, I have shown how our government violates the Constitution; in all these instances, I have never seen you provide a response to the ethical dilemma, where you get logical absolutes from, or any contrary perspective on the Constitution from a civil or historical defense against my claims. You only whine and call names.
Posted by CHG]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:55:14 -0600 Memphis Flyer
Here is the correct link to the Encyclopedia Britannica for kids regarding nomadic Indians:

http://kids.britannica.com/comptons/articl…
Posted by CHG]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:10:06 -0600 Memphis Flyer
Why didn't you answer the many previous times I and others have repeatedly provided those examples of your being flat out wrong? Why not address them honestly now?
Posted by UppityCholo]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:08:42 -0600 Memphis Flyer
Please provide examples of accusations you have listed here and how I have falsely interpreted the Constitution, philosophy, and Theology. I would like to see the rational defenses you have rather than the ad-hominem attacks that you and Packrat are only able to offer.
Posted by CHG]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:35:29 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by CHG]]> Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:30:10 -0600 Memphis Flyer
I'd be tempted to join Packrat in saying that someone who is trapped in such a rut should merely be ridiculed, but at this point, as many times as his imaginary history, science, and law books, and his fabricated Consitutional, philosophical, and scriptural 'quotes' have been debunked by comparison with reality... it seems like pity is the more benevolent reaction.


Posted by UppityCholo]]> Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:45:24 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by Packrat]]> Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:44:26 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by 38103]]> Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:59:31 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by Packrat]]> Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:36:33 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by CHG]]> Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:34:25 -0600 Memphis Flyer
As pointed out to you repeatedly, complete with real world examples, your postings present every appearance of playing some sort of dishonest game.

The number of deliberate lies you tell (even after irrefutable proof of their falseness is presented), the number of things other people have never said that you fabricate and regurgitate, your blatant denial that you've posted the falsehoods everyone else can see, and the schoolyard logical fallacies you hide behind, makes 'debating' with you the same sort of venture as sitting down to play cards with someone who brags about how good they are at cheating.

In short, you don't deserve any rebuttal, because you made the free choice to throw your credibility out the window.
Posted by UppityCholo]]> Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:16:00 -0600 Memphis Flyer

Posted by Chris Davis]]> Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:26:50 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by CHG]]> Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:28:50 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by UppityCholo]]> Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:40:31 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by 38103]]> Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:33:21 -0600 Memphis Flyer Posted by CHG]]> Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:35:01 -0600 Memphis Flyer