As Unions Go ... 

So goes the middle class, for better or for worse.

At no other time in my almost 30-year career as a union labor lawyer have employees had more reason to join or form a union. 

What employee does not want protection from unfair layoffs or someone to protect their job from elimination? What laid-off employee does not want someone to negotiate their severance pay, health insurance, or enhanced pension benefits? 

Yet, according to a recent Bureau of Labor Statistics report, unions lost 612,000 members in 2010, dropping the unionized share of the work force to 11.9 percent from 12.3 percent in 2009. Union membership in the private sector fell from 7.2 percent to 6.9 percent, the lowest point since the infancy of the labor movement in the 1930s.

The correlation between strong unions and a strong economy in this country is fact. Economist Paul Krugman referred to the years 1929-1947 as "the birth of the middle class." These years also saw the birth and growth of the modern union movement. The number of U.S. workers belonging to labor unions increased from 3.6 million to 15.4 million during those years.

The postwar prosperity years of 1947 to 1973 saw further growth in union membership. As Richard A. Levins wrote, "Middle class economies don't just happen. They are made. Union made."

The wage advantage for a typical union worker is 13.7 percent. The union wage advantage for a low-wage worker is 20.6 percent, says the Center for Economic and Policy Research. Even Fed chairman Ben Bernanke opined in 2008 that there was good evidence that cash that goes to low- and moderate-income people is more likely to be spent in the near future than monies that go to the rich.

The rich spend only so much and then just keep getting richer. The middle class spends out of a felt necessity, thereby contributing to a vigorous economy. 

But, as good union jobs are lost overseas and replaced with minimum-wage jobs with no benefits, the middle class in this country is going the same way as unions — away. The good manufacturing jobs are disappearing, and now we see letters to the editor begrudging auto workers for desiring a good wage, health benefits, and a retirement to look forward to.

In Memphis, the International Harvester and Firestone union jobs are a thing of the past and have not been replaced with anything equivalent. Not coincidentally, the median income across all sectors in Memphis is $30,875, and, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the income gap between rich and poor in Shelby County is continually growing. 

I fear what this country will be like with the continued decline of the middle class. I wonder what jobs there will be for the high school graduates of the future. They can't all be corporate CEOs or doctors or lawyers. 

I see a country of increasingly rich and increasingly poor, a country more and more polarized. As surely as growth in union participation led to a strong middle class, falling participation has weakened it.

The loss of the middle class leads to an unstable economy polarized into rich and poor. Resurgent unions could balance that power and lead us to where we need to be: a growing, middle-class economy. Government policies that favor unions and the middle class are necessary to keep our economy both fair and growing. 

The currently fashionable attack on unions is not the answer. Companies join together to form cooperatives and chambers of commerce lobby for their interests. But when employees do something similar to better their circumstances, it somehow becomes suspect.

When people criticize unions, I remind them that unions are identical to the people who are their members. Unions give employees — ordinary people — the opportunity to have a voice in the terms and conditions of their employment. Unions sponsor pension plans that invest in the economy, as well as apprenticeship programs that train skilled workers. 

The Roosevelt administration's three-legged stool of retirement — one based on a triad of Social Security, employer-sponsored pensions, and private savings — is wobbling more than ever. 401(k) plans won't replace the legs of the stool. (The average 401(k) balance as of March 31, 2010, was $66,900, according to Boston-based Fidelity Investments, which has 11 million participants.)      

We need better jobs, better wages, and better benefits to improve the economy. If you think we don't need unions anymore, think again. 

Deborah Godwin is a Memphis labor lawyer.

Comments (14)

Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
    • Rand Paul’s Malfunction

      The campaign of Rand Paul offers further proof that the American political system is broken.
    • Memphis’ Turn

      Nashville’s had a good run; now we’re getting ours.
    • No Red-light Cameras

      Their use works against American legal tradition and public safety.

Blogs

Beyond the Arc

Beyond the Arc Podcast, Episode 011: Blazer Madness

Style Sessions

Thuyvi Vo - Weekend Wear from Stock&Belle

Hungry Memphis

Pyramid Vodka's Tasting Room and Tour

Beyond the Arc

Beyond the Arc’s Official Response to Ian Karmel

Tiger Blue

Memphis Tiger Trivia (answer)

Politics Beat Blog

Joe Towns Goes Upbeat as the General Assembly Ends

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2015

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation