GADFLY: What Will Fitz Do Next? 

New Page 1

WHAT WOULD FITZ DO?

 

Given the revelations over the weekend that the government is back in the business of spying on American citizens, and the gauntlet-throwing admission by Bush that he authorized such action, and would do it again, the question now is, who can reign in this outlaw administration, and who can do it before any more damage is done. My answer to that question is: Patrick Fitzgerald.

 

Sadly, the Special Prosecutor's mandate does not include violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which criminalizes domestic spying, but count me among those who believe that this straight-shooting, law-enforcing, righteous American hero was probably one of the most shocked, and possibly even outraged, recipients of the news that our President believes he is above the law.  As Fitzgerald has already concluded, this attitude of arrogance and nose-thumbing is endemic in the Bush White House.  It manifests itself in the leaking of national security information and in the belief that truth and the rule of law are considered dispensable by the current occupants of the White House.

 

Fitzgerald already knows that Libby and Rove lie when it suits them (and, of course, we all know that Bush, Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al. have a history of doing so as well), and that they regard the law as something that applies to them only when they decide it does.  He also knows that Cheney was in the Plame leak up to his ears, and that he knew, when he told Libby about Plame's employment, that she was a covert CIA operative (Paragraph 9 of the Libby Indictment). Whether Fitzgerald has enough now, with the benefit of his second grand jury (and remember, I predicted that he wasn't finished when he announced his first go-round of indictments --  to modify the Libby indictment, or to indict Rove and/or Cheney, he clearly has the power to send an arrow through the lying heart of the renegade White House.  An indictment of Rove, even if it's only for lying to federal agents and/or to a grand jury, will burst the balloon inflated by the hubris of an administration that recognizes no strictures on its conduct, legal or otherwise. 

 

Remember, too, that we still don't know what Fitzgerald knows about Bob Novak's source for the leak which first appeared in his column, and set off the firestorm that culminated with Fitzgerald's appointment.  But, we now have a clue about that, given Novak's surprising revelation that Bush knows who his source was, raising the possibility that Bush himself may have been involved in the leak, and if so, that he may have some criminal responsibility for breaking that law.  And while Bush can't be indicted by a grand jury, he can certainly be named an unindicted co-conspirator, which is, after all, the treatment Cheney received in the Libby indictment.

 

Given that the Republican congress has shown itself to be nothing more than a rubber stamp for Bush's policies, whether it was treatment of prisoners in Guantanamo, sweetheart contracts with Halliburton, kissing the oil companies' butts or the other demonstrable excesses of this administration, there is absolutely no reason to believe the congress will be any more effective at reigning in, much less holding to account, the Bush domestic wiretapping program.  This is especially so given that some congressional leaders were, in fact, informed of this illegal program and did nothing to stop it. The last thing we need here is another congressional show hearing, as Senator Specter is promising to do.


Mr.  Fitzpatrick, where are you now that we need you?

 

           

 

Want to respond? Send us an email here.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
    • Shelby County Democrats to Revive

      Mancini forms group to begin reorganization for defunct local party; Cohen holds town hall.
    • The Buddy System

      Harris and Kelsey hope to effect a good public outcome on the TVA/aquifer issue.
    • The Abortion Divide, Again

      An HIV prevention grant to Planned Parenthood is narrowly approved as the County Commission splits along party lines.

Blogs

Exhibit M

Make Art Great Again

Intermission Impossible

Blood & Ballet: Dance Two Ways

Intermission Impossible

Talking Carole King with Beautiful Star Julia Knitel

Tiger Blue

UConn 65, Tigers 62

Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Oxford Film Festival Celebrates History, Diversity

News Blog

ArtsMemphis Combats Funding Threats

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Marty Aussenberg

  • Union Made

    At this low point in labor history, the Gadfly is on strike from the consensus.
    • Jun 28, 2012
  • GADFLY: It's Fall Already, but "Occupy Wall Street" Has Finally Brought an American Spring

    "The media were faced with the problem of how best to discredit this rising tide of protest, and settled on suggesting that the protesters didn't even know what they were protesting about.... Strange how that criticism was never leveled at the Tea Party...."
    • Oct 3, 2011
  • GADFLY: Our 9/11 Mourning is Misdirected

    "I would rather mourn the lack of accountability of the people who let it happen, or the people who continue to be its victims, far-removed from where it happened though they may be...."
    • Sep 13, 2011
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Election 2015: The Mike Williams Factor

    Some think three’s already a crowd in the mayor’s race, but a fourth candidate insists there’s room for more.
    • Sep 3, 2015
  • Filling the Space

    For all the in-fighting, we’re all looking for the same thing, and sometimes we can realize it.
    • Jul 14, 2016
  • Wellspring Politics in Memphis

    With a crucial deadline approaching next week, the local “Protect the Aquifier” movement picks up steam.
    • Nov 24, 2016
ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation