Letter from the Editor 

Five years after Pearl Harbor, the United States was already engaged in the rebuilding of Japan. Five years after 9/11, our troops are refereeing a bloody internal war in Iraq between Sunnis, Shiites, and assorted terrorist groups; the Taliban is reemerging in Afghanistan; and Osama bin Laden? He's become the ultimate boogeyman, more useful to this administration as a living symbol for the bad guys than as a dead enemy leader.

So how did we overcome the massed armies, navies, and air forces of the original "axis of evil" -- Japan, Germany, and Italy -- in four years? And how is it that we have become embroiled in a seemingly endless battle against scattered terrorists using car bombs, IEDs, and machine guns? The differences in the two conflicts are many, but primarily I think it's a matter of how we've defined the enemy -- and how we've chosen our battles.

The president keeps saying we have to win the "war on terror." But as so many have written, terrorism is a tactic, and as such is no more beatable than would be a "war on kidnapping" or a "war on mugging." To extend the analogy, invading and overthrowing the government of a country that endorsed kidnapping would do nothing to prevent a kidnapping from happening in Millington.

The "enemy" is not terror. It is those who use terrorism as a tactic -- the loosely organized and diverse radical groups operating in dozens of countries around the world. I have no doubt that terrorist cells are working in this country right now and that we should be "fighting them here" rather than overextending our forces and resources "over there."

Vice President Cheney this week charged that critics of the administration's policies were giving comfort to our enemies. And President Bush once again threw out the specter of 9/11 to reinforce his belief that we need to "stay the course" in Iraq -- apparently no matter how long that might take or how many Americans die in the process.

I think most Americans now believe we need a fresh approach and that staying the course that got us into this mess is no longer -- if it ever was -- the country's best option. In any war, it's important to know how to choose your battles. This administration has chosen poorly, over and over again.

Bruce VanWyngarden, Editor

brucev@MemphisFlyer.com

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
    • Letter from the Editor

      It's World Cup time. Try not to act like an American.
    • Letter From the Editor

      The Henri Brooks debacle and the future of politics.
    • Letter From the Editor

      The results of the Central American femicide epidemic lead to Mason, Tennessee.

More by Bruce VanWyngarden

  • Letter from the Editor

    It's time for a compromise in the Memphis city budget squabble.
    • Jul 3, 2014
  • Letter From the Editor

    The results of the Central American femicide epidemic lead to Mason, Tennessee.
    • Jun 26, 2014
  • More »

Top Viewed Stories

ADVERTISEMENT

Flyer Flashback

Looking Back at the Flyer’s $50,000 Giveaway

To celebrate the Flyer’s 25th year, we’ll be using this space each week to look back on stories from past issues.

Read Story

Site Search

From the Archives

  • Letter from the Editor

    I used to wonder how the writers for The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, the Late Show, and other topical comedy programs managed to come up with so much fresh material
    • Aug 24, 2006
  • Letter From The Editor

    Live audio from the G8 Summit of world leaders: "Yo, Blair, my main man! Whatup, dawg?" "Oh yes, hello, George. Lovely to see you. A word with you in private, if I may ... "
    • Jul 20, 2006
  • More »

Most Commented On

© 1996-2014

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Memphis Business Quarterly
Powered by Foundation