Letter from the Editor 

Last weekend, The Commercial Appeal endorsed presidential nominees for the two major parties. The paper recommended Democrats vote for Hillary Clinton and Republicans cast their ballots for John McCain.

Do you care? Will the CA's recommendations influence the way you vote? Is there any argument the paper could bring to bear for either candidate that you haven't already read or heard? I seriously doubt it. That's not a knock on the CA, which is only doing what almost every major daily in the country does when elections roll around. It's an American journalistic tradition that goes back 200 years.

When the tradition of endorsements started, there was some rationale behind it: Newspapers were the public's surrogate eyes and ears. They were closer to the candidates — reporting on them daily, following them on the campaign trail, interviewing them in editorial boardrooms.

But in this age of multiple televised debates, political websites, nightly cable news shows, and Sunday morning interview programs, endorsements come off more as hubris than expertise. Anyone who wants to analyze a candidate for themselves can easily do so. An official endorsement from a newspaper is just one more element to consider — and probably not a defining one — at least in non-local elections.

And by recommending one candidate over the other, a newspaper opens itself to criticism that it is biased toward that candidate — or against his opponents — in its subsequent news coverage. Which is why the Flyer doesn't endorse.

As editor, of course, I have my opinions. I would never, for example, endorse a candidate whose husband was overbearing and a potential embarassment when further revelations about his sexual antics come to light. Nor would I endorse anyone who supports the disastrous policies of the current Republican administration. And I hate guys with perfect hair.

I would endorse a man who excites young people and brings fresh hope for real change and who isn't a tired baby-boomer. I could endorse someone who's been opposed to this war from its inception and who's shown he can win handily in places as disparate as Iowa and South Carolina. But that's just me.

Bruce VanWyngarden

brucev@memphisflyer.com

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Blogs

News Blog

Meet the New Blue Suede Brigade

Fly On The Wall Blog

How Much News is on the News: A Guns & Bunnies Web Extra

Intermission Impossible

August Wilson's Metaphysical "Gem of the Ocean" Opens at The Hattiloo

Politics Beat Blog

Two Bites from the Thursday Night Smorgasbord

News Blog

Photo Contest Focuses on Memphis Bikes

News Blog

Live at the Garden guests prepare to party

News Blog

Bike Lanes and Plazas to Pop Up Downtown

Intermission Impossible

Nuremberg Revisited: An Indie Theater Company Does its Homework

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Bruce VanWyngarden

Readers also liked…

  • Vendor in the Grass

    The lady doth protest too much, methinks. — William Shakespeare

    Is there such a thing as "bad activism"? I'm asking because I'm seeing a lot of criticism of the folks who are protesting the Memphis Zoo's encroachment onto the Greensward at Overton Park.

    • Mar 31, 2016
  • The Death of Status Symbols

    • Oct 6, 2016
  • Have Yourselves an Angry Little Christmas

    In the 14 years I've been the Flyer editor, I've gotten lots of hate mail. It mostly used to come in envelopes filled with pages of scrawled handwriting. I read them and put them in the wastebasket, chalking it up as a natural by-product of writing for a liberal paper in the conservative South. Lately, the angry folks have switched to email, and it comes in waves ...

    • Dec 10, 2015
ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation