Letter From the Editor 

How much input should the public have in the construction of major projects? That depends on who owns the property and who's impacted by its development. Public properties should have public input. Private properties can be a balancing act.

In Overton Square, for example, things appear to be back to, er, square one with the news this week that developers are backing out of a proposed project to build a grocery store and four buildings on the south side of Madison.

One of the co-owners of the property told John Branston (p. 17) that the company wanted to "work with the community." To me, this is a good thing, because I think those whose property values are impacted by a development, even if it's on private property, should have a voice in what's being built.

click to enlarge airportgarage-sunset_t607.jpg

But what about the new parking garage/rental-car facility at Memphis International Airport? In case you haven't heard about it, it's an $89 million, seven-story structure that will become the new public "face" of the airport. It's a huge, stainless-steel edifice that will feature a 40-foot logo of an airplane with a contrail that becomes a music note. It will obscure from view the Roy Harrover-designed "martini glass" terminal that has been the airport's signature look since the 1960s.

This project is not in anybody's "neighborhood," though it will greatly impact one of our most significant public spaces. The decision to build it — and its design — have not, to my knowledge, had much public input. The design was unveiled January 6th, and construction is scheduled to start March 1st. Done deal, I'd say.

Much of the thinking regarding the new garage is laudable: It will eliminate polluting shuttle-bus trips from rental-car agencies now located two miles away. It will provide more convenient parking and a moving sidewalk into the terminal.

Convention and Visitors Bureau head Kevin Kane called the garage's design "spectacular." Memphis Heritage president Marty Gorman said, "The classic terminal building ... is totally blocked by this seven-story behemoth."

In my opinion, the thing is butt-ugly. Approaching the Memphis airport, especially at night, has always been a visual delight. Soon, probably not so much.

Was there a way to incorporate or play off of Harrover's design to blend the new with the old? Or to put more of the garage underground or off to the side? Maybe not. But we'll never know, because the decision has been made for us.

Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
    • Flat City

    • Paper Cuts

Blogs

News Blog

Contemporary Media Inc. Hires Michael Donahue

News Blog

Circuit on Street Safety Kicks Off

Fly On The Wall Blog

Memphis is Ugly. Cleveland Still Uglier, According to BS List

Fly On The Wall Blog

Reading the CA: This Column by I. Dunno

News Blog

Revisions of Overton Gateway Plan Revealed

Fly On The Wall Blog

When Local News Isn't Local: A "Guns & Bunnies" Slideshow

Politics Beat Blog

Vouchers Bill Dead for 2017 Legislative Session

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Bruce VanWyngarden

Readers also liked…

ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation