Letter From the Editor 

Sunday morning I awoke in a tent on the Eleven Point River to the sounds of two crows in a tree overhead loudly discussing the odds of getting into our food stash. It was 6:30 a.m., so I clambered out and shooed them away, thinking that I would try to go back to sleep, but the river had other ideas.

I stared as a bald eagle circled overhead. A great blue heron stood in the crystal shallows just upstream. And across the river, what first appeared to be the Loch Ness monster turned out to be a family of four river otters. I watched silently as they frolicked, thanking Mother Nature for her morning gifts.

click to enlarge RiverOtter_Dmitry-Azovtsev..jpg

Back in Memphis that evening, I read the Sunday paper. The pundits were picking over the remains of last week's election. There was some clucking about a "dirty little secret," namely that white voters didn't vote for black candidates. Others were saying that Steve Cohen's election meant that Memphis had entered a "post-racial" electoral era. I don't think either claim holds water.

If we are truly post-racial, then why is everybody keeping tabs on the candidates' race and adding up the score? And if white voters don't vote for black candidates, how do you explain A C Wharton's landslide victories?

I have my own little secret, and I don't think I'm alone in this: Sometimes, particularly for down-ballot offices, I honestly don't know whether some candidates are black or white. If I haven't heard about a scandal in a particular office, I'll usually vote for the incumbent. Same with retaining judges. I think most of us — black, white, and brown — vote on name recognition and our impression of whether a candidate is honest, competent, and baggage-free.

I voted for Democrats and Republicans, blacks and whites. Did I vote for more white people than black, more Democrats than Republicans? I didn't check. I don't care. Next time, the numbers in any of those categories might go the other way. The point I'm trying to make is that I think most of us have stopped counting. We're looking for good people to vote for — people we can trust to handle our tax dollars and run our governmental and judicial offices with intelligence.

One thing does seem clear: A candidate can no longer win by campaigning on a platform of "vote for me because of my race." (So long, Willie. See you, Thaddeus Matthews.) Does that mean Memphis has become "post-racial"? I don't think so. I don't even think that's desirable. But it might mean that most of us have become "post-racist."

And that would be something to crow about.

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
    • Oh, Puck

      The Mid-South Coliseum’s defenders — and detractors — have some work to do.
    • Everything That’s True

      On disengaging from the hive and listening to the heart.
    • Time to Trickle Up

      Revitalizing the middle-class won't happen if we keep doing the same thing while expecting a different result.

Blogs

Tiger Blue

SMU 66, Tigers 57

Music Blog

Cities Aviv Premiers New Songs on Fader

Memphis Gaydar

Cherry's "Love Or Lack Thereof" Burlesque Party

Music Blog

Weekend Roundup Part Seven

Politics Beat Blog

Hats in Ring for Vacant Democratic Chairmanship

News Blog

City's Public Works Division Preparing for Snow

Hungry Memphis

At the Swine & Wine for Cozy Corner

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Bruce VanWyngarden

ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2015

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation