Zoo Land vs. Parkland
I am totally outraged at the insensitivity the Memphis Zoo showed in its development of its new exhibit ("Up a Tree," March 6th issue). For the sake of expansion, the zoo chose to destroy four acres of old-growth forest in Overton Park. It is environmentally moronic.
I consider myself informed and active regarding environmental issues in our city. I use the park at least twice a week, and yet I had no idea the zoo had plans to "develop" this area. If the nonprofit group Friends of Overton Park knew of this project, why wasn't the public informed? Who is speaking for the trees?
Who did the environmental-impact study on this project? Something like this would never happen in an enlightened city. It is repulsive that we have forever lost one of the last pieces of old-growth forest in the city in exchange for an exhibit that cages wolves and bears.
My fellow citizens, our city power-brokers and leaders are failing us. It's time to break out the monkey wrench.
Billy Simpson
Memphis
Strip Clubs
I predict we will be reading about strip clubs, legislation, lawsuits, and public-vs.-private morality for the next few years, thanks to the new ordinance passed by our "holier than thou" County Commission ("The Bottom Line," March 6th issue). Governments can try to regulate sexual behavior, but strip clubs and sexually oriented businesses exist in every country that isn't controlled by a rigid state religion. Last time I looked, we don't have one of those in the United States. Stringent legislation will just push S.O.B.'s (which are legal, by the way) underground, where there is even less chance to regulate them. Visit Salt Lake City sometime. It doesn't "allow" S.O.B.'s either, but you can find them.
I agree S.O.B.'s shouldn't be allowed to ruin the area around the Memphis airport. Legitimate businesses have a right to prosper without having to deal with hookers and massage parlors. I tend to agree with Councilman Shea Flinn, that we should create a "red-light district" and confine S.O.B.'s to a particular area. Tax the heck out of them and reap the "bottom line," but don't imagine S.O.B.'s will go away just because you create some tight regulations. This is the "dirty South," and it always will be.
Samuel Martin
Memphis
Obama and Terrorism
The recent false charges by the Tennessee Republican Party that equate Barack Obama with terrorism and anti-Semitism are an outrage (Politics, March 6th issue). What especially troubles me as a former resident of Tennessee who occasionally voted for a moderate Republican is that Tennessee's Republican leadership, including Robin Smith, would join the national GOP's racist smear campaign against Obama.
I'm disgusted with the grip that the right wing still has over most of the Republican Party. Tennessee used to elect moderate (and occasionally even liberal) Republicans like the late Congressman Howard Baker Sr. (father of former Senator Howard Baker Jr.) who opposed Truman's reckless militarism during the Korean War (our first Vietnam). Baker even helped defeat a draconian military conscription bill in 1952, called Universal Military Training/Service, which would have replaced the Selective Service conscription law.
I hope Tennessee's Republican Party will have the decency to repudiate its racist and slanderous portrayal of Obama and return to its more moderate roots.
William R. Delzell
Springfield, Massachusetts
Oil Policies
President Bush recently chided the OPEC nations for not pumping more oil from the ground and putting it on the world market. Once again, it's someone else's fault for his failed policies. Bush thinks Americans have forgotten the real facts:
In 2002, Vice President Dick Cheney refused to even reveal who was on his energy task force. The GAO sued to try and find out, to no avail.
When Republicans won control of Congress, they passed a record tax reduction for big oil companies.
Both the president and veep have repeatedly scoffed at the idea of energy conservation. In fact, for the last 27 years, Republicans and a few Democrats have blocked higher gas-mileage requirements for cars and trucks.
Since Bush and Cheney have been in the White House, big oil companies have had record profits while paying less in taxes. Only a small amount of those profits have been invested in renewable energy sources.
Bush's failed energy policies have put our national security in danger.
Jack Bishop
Cordova
Showing 1-1 of 1
Let's blame someone who has nothing to do with the problem that I am blaming him for. George Bush and the cost of gasoline. Well the fact that OPEC will not increase production of crude oil is part of the problem, yes, but the other side of the coin is the fact that the Democratic Party and the socilist minded eco-terror groups that support them, refuses to allow the evil oil companies to build any new refineries or drill for oil here in America. That must be W's fault as well. "Energy Conservation" is another red herring. The last time that conservation was proposed by the government and the energy producers we (the Public) did just as the government and producers of energy ask of us and we stopped using as much energy just like they wanted us to. Then the other shoe dropped. Energy prices to us consumers ( who did just what was asked of us ) sky rocketed. The reason given to us by those same energy producers was "the consumers aren't using as much energy" so we must raise the prices that we charge them. The less there is sold the more it cost. Imagine that! And I don't recall seeing Jack Bishop's outrage when Hillary Clinton (an unelected at the time Hillary) was sued when she spent some 93 million tax-payer dollars on her failed attempt to have the government take over the health industry, and then refused to tell us (the tax-payers) where and how that money was spent. We (the tax-payers) tried to, to no avail. Blaming someone that has absolutely no control over what private industry does is asinine, and is ignoring the facts that are out there. Unless you choose to ignore them because of some personal partisan bias.
Comments (1) RSS