My First (and Last) Time With Bill O'Reilly< 

A guest on The O'Reilly Factor violates the rules of Fox News' spin-free zone.

It started innocuously enough. On June 21st, a producer from Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor called to ask me to appear as a guest that evening to comment on a front-page story in The New York Times claiming that the Bush administration had overstated the value of intelligence gained at Guantanamo and the dangers posed by the men detained there. I'm generally not a fan of shout-television and I had declined several prior invitations to appear on O'Reilly's show, but this time I said yes. Little did I know it would not only be my first time, but also my last.

I sat in the Washington studio as the taping of the show began in New York with a rant from Bill O'Reilly. He claimed that The Factor had established the link between al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and then played a clip from Thomas Kean, head of the Senate's 9/11 Commission, in which Kean said, "There is no evidence that we can find whatsoever that Iraq or Saddam Hussein participated in any way in attacks on the United States, in other words, on 9/11. What we do say, however, is there were contacts between Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Iraq, Saddam ... excuse me, al-Qaeda."

I was impressed. O'Reilly, who calls his show the "No Spin Zone," was actually playing a balanced soundbite, one that accurately reported the commission's findings, both that there was no evidence linking Saddam and 9/11 and that there was some evidence of contacts (if no "collaborative relationship") between Saddam and al-Qaeda. Maybe all those nasty things Al Franken had said about O'Reilly weren't true after all.

But suddenly O'Reilly interrupted, plainly angry, and said, "We can't use that! We need to redo the whole thing." Three minutes of silence later, the show began again, with O'Reilly re-recording the introduction verbatim. Except this time, when he got to the part about Kean, he played no tape, and simply paraphrased Kean as confirming that "definitely there was a connection between Saddam and al-Qaeda." The part about no link to 9/11 was left on the cutting-room floor.

Now it was my turn. O'Reilly introduced the segment by complaining that we are at war and need to be united, but that newspapers like The New York Times are running biased stories, dividing the country and aiding the enemy. "The spin must stop. All our lives depend on it," O'Reilly gravely intoned. He then characterized the Times story that day as claiming that the Guantanamo detainees were "innocent people" and "harmless." He said the paper's article "questions holding the detainees at Guantanamo."

I noted that the Times had said nothing of the sort. And I pointed out that the article relied on a CIA study finding that the detainees seemed to be low-level and had provided little valuable intelligence.

That didn't convince O'Reilly, however, who again criticized the Times for misleading its readers by terming the detainees innocent and not dangerous. I replied that he was misleading his own viewers by exaggerating what the Times had said. "No, I'm not," he retorted. So far, the usual fare on news-talk television.

But then I decided to go one step further: "It seems to me like the pot calling the kettle black, Bill, because I just sat here five minutes ago as you re-recorded the introduction to this show to take out a statement from the head of the 9/11 commission stating that there was no evidence of a link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11."

Apparently O'Reilly does not like being called "the pot." He exploded, repeatedly called me an "S.O.B." and assured me that he would cut my accusation from the interview when the show aired. He also said I would "never ever" be on his show again. At this point, I wasn't sure whether to take that as a threat or a promise.

Sure enough, when The O'Reilly Factor aired later that night, both Kean's statement about 9/11 and my charge about O'Reilly deleting it were missing. All that was left was Bill O'Reilly, fuming at the liberal media's lack of objectivity and balance and ruing the divisive effect "spin" has on our national unity.

David Cole is The Nation's legal affairs correspondent and a professor at Georgetown University Law Center.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Blogs

Music Blog

Beale Street Music Fest Announces 2017 Lineup

News Blog

Memphians Stage First Public Rebuke of MPD's List

News Blog

TDOT Hosts PG-Rated Highway Safety Message Contest

Hungry Memphis

Beer Bracket Challenge Launches Wednesday

Intermission Impossible

Hamilton in 2019! (Orpheum Also Announces its 2017-18 Season)

News Blog

Questions Remain About City Hall "Blacklist"

Intermission Impossible

Muslims, Jews, and Shakespeare: Rhodes Hosts a Timely Symposium

Exhibit M

Resources for Artists

Beyond the Arc

Beyond the Arc Podcast #70: Grading the Grizzlies

ADVERTISEMENT

Readers also liked…

ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation