Pins and Panders 

Barack Obama wears his independence on his lapel.

Sometimes I think the best thing about Barack Obama is that little empty space on his lapel. It is where other politicians wear the American flag pin, a kitschy piece of empty symbolism that tells you nothing about that particular person except that he or she thinks like everyone else. Obama's flag, invisible to the naked eye, is the Jolly Roger of a politician thinking for himself.

The flag-pin issue arose last fall when someone noticed that Obama was campaigning in the patriotic nude. After the September 11th terrorist attacks, wearing the pin had become de rigueur for politicians. Obama, too, had worn the pin but took it off when he started "noticing people wearing a lapel pin, but not acting very patriotic." Some of these people, he said unconvincingly, were not voting for veterans' benefits and the like — "not voting to make sure that disability payments were coming out on time."

I suspect more to the point — and much more important than votes on veterans' issues — was Obama's sense that the flag pin, rather than representing patriotism, was an emblem of conformity and hypocrisy. Richard Nixon, for instance, sported one while undermining the Constitution and, in private, cursing all sorts of minority groups. And history does not record whether his vice president, Spiro T. Agnew, took his pin off on the solemn occasions when he received bribes in the White House. Somehow, the flag pin did not improve the character of either man.

Obama better expressed his feelings later in the campaign when, during a Democratic debate on April 16th, he was asked by ABC's Charlie Gibson why he didn't sport the lapel pin, and he answered, if I may paraphrase, that the flag flew in his heart.

"Well, look, I revere the American flag," he said. "And I would not be running for president if I did not revere this country. I would not be standing here if it wasn't for this country. And I've said this — again, there's no other country in which my story is even possible." He is, as countless foreigners will attest, a resplendent emblem of American possibilities.

Many people will read a lot of meaning into Obama's refusal to wear the pin. Some will see it as a lack of patriotism, an emotional distance from the country that has served him so well. Others, including me, see it as an expression of cool, the statement of a candidate who wants to be president but not at the cost of his intellectual integrity. And still others (me again) will see it as Obama's push-back, his reluctance to do something simply because it is demanded of him.

An allergy to cant can be an admirable quality in a politician, although not necessarily a politically smart one. Obama, for example, is right to label Hillary Clinton's proposal to have the government lift the gas tax this summer as "a classic Washington gimmick." Still, gimmicks like this win votes.

If Obama is going to be the Democratic nominee, such eruptions of common sense could cost him. For instance, he got an A on my Ethanol Test of Political Integrity for telling Tim Russert that "if it turns out that we've got to make changes in our ethanol policy to help people get something to eat, then that's got to be the step we take." Such candor may not go down well in the Farm Belt. Obama did not exactly denounce government ethanol subsidies, and he did praise ethanol as "an important transitional tool for us to start dealing with our long-term energy crisis," but what was refreshingly missing was the usual pandering about the consummate (and mostly fictional) virtues of ethanol.

This column would itself be an exercise in pandering if it did not acknowledge that, on occasion, Obama can practice the old politics with the best of them. He's been all over the place on gun control, and he's been backpedaling and fudging about the Rev. Jeremiah Wright for some time. After all, it was back in January that the Obama campaign was informed that Wright had praised Louis Farrakhan to high heaven, ignoring the Nation of Islam leader's anti-Semitism — and not just recently, as Obama has said.

Still, it is bracing to see a presidential candidate recoil, for the most part, from the orthodoxies of pandering. In this regard, the lack of a flag pin has become an important sign of Obama's desire to think for himself. For all it says about Obama, I salute it.

Richard Cohen writes for the Washington Post Writers Group.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment



News Blog

Thousands Join Memphis Women's March

Politics Beat Blog

One Eye on The Memphis Women's March, January 21, 2017

News Blog

PODCAST: Two Flyer Guys and the Portland Protests

Beyond the Arc

Grizzlies 107, Kings 91: Game Notes

Intermission Impossible

Hitchcock, Cock Rock, and Bayard Rustin Live on Stage

Tiger Blue

Tigers 70, Houston 67 (OT)

News Blog

Sierra Club Protests Trump's EPA Choice

Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Memphis Comedy Bad, Bad Men Premieres on Amazon Video


More by Richard Cohen

  • Coach Trump

    • Sep 23, 2016
  • Addicted to Trump

    His genius is in keeping us interested and outraged — day after day.
    • Aug 23, 2016
  • Hillary Mans Up

    If Hillary Clinton was a man, how different would this presidential race be?
    • Aug 4, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Pay the Band

    Why we should be supporting proposed national music initiatives in Congress.
    • Aug 10, 2015
  • A Letter to the Memphis City Council

    The council gets an “F” for its performance on the Greensward decision.
    • Mar 10, 2016
  • No Female Mayors?

    Not for Memphis or for Shelby County, at least, not yet.
    • Sep 17, 2015
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation