Letters to the Editor

Here's to Doctors

To the Editor:

In regard to your story about OxyContin ("I Want a New Drug," Jan. 30th issue), there will always be a segment of society that will abuse that which helps others. There are many doctors who are afraid to treat pain with medication for fear of prosecution. There are many organizations that would like to have OxyContin taken out of production.

I suffered with chronic lower-back pain for over 15 years until I found a doctor who cared enough to pursue a cause for the pain. An MRI showed a degenerative condition in three discs. Surgery was recommended, with no guarantee that I would be pain-free.

Three years ago, I was prescribed OxyContin. There are never any refills given. I see my doctor every three to four months for evaluation and a new prescription. My dosage has never been increased. OxyContin is a godsend for many chronic-pain sufferers. Without this medication, I would not be able to work and would probably be on disability.

Here's to the doctors with the compassion and courage to prescribe medication for pain. After all, this is the 21st century.

Raymond Farr


Oil and Money

To the Editor:

Let me see if I've got this straight: President Bush is concerned that one country might sell weapons of mass destruction to terrorists, so we should attack them immediately. I'm sorry, but we shouldn't murder people because they might harm our society (Editorial, January 30th issue). We don't burn down liquor stores, even though more people are killed each year by drunk drivers than died in the World Trade Center attacks.

This proposed war is all about oil and money. If Bush wants this war so bad, his daughters should be the first in battle. I'll fight for my home and my kids but not for some elitist rich boy who wants to push the weak around. We shouldn't be surprised when the weak push back someday. We're screwed.

Clay Clark


Gore Apologists

To the Editor:

The Gore apologists are at it again, with their "Nader robbed us" mantra (Letters, Jan. 23rd issue). How much easier it is for them to ascribe blame to anyone but their own candidate than to accept responsibility for his loss. Let's look at the facts, hopefully one last time.

The most important single fact about Gore's loss is that he lost his own home state. No one's done that since McGovern lost South Dakota in 1972, quite an accomplishment and one Nader had absolutely nothing to do with. Had Gore carried Tennessee, he would have won the election. End of discussion.

Gore lost Florida not because of Nader but because of his own performance. He failed miserably to capture the traditional Democrat constituencies of the elderly and female voters. He alienated the Cuban-American community in the Elian Gonzales flap by transparently pandering to the "let's make him a citizen" vote, as a result of which he got tens of thousands fewer votes in Miami-Dade County than Clinton did in 1996. He also lost the environmental vote (read: potential Nader votes) by refusing to take a position on an important issue involving a proposed reliever airport to be sandwiched between two national parks in South Florida.

But the most dishonest of the Gore-whiner arguments is that the votes that were cast for Nader undoubtedly would have gone to Gore. This is nonsense. Nader effectively campaigned on an anti-big-party theme that skewered both Gore and Bush. He said there was no difference between the parties or their standard-bearers when it came to selling out to special interests. That resonated with many voters who otherwise had no intention of voting because they were tired of the disconnect between their values and the sleazy, money-grubbing practices of both of the major-party candidates. Many, if not most, of those who voted for Nader did so because he represented the only viable choice for them. Absent Nader on the ballot, they would have voted for neither of the major party candidates.

It's long past time for all the sore Gore losers to stop trying to find scapegoats and start recognizing that their candidate blew it, all by himself.

Martin H. Aussenberg


The Memphis Flyer encourages reader response. Send mail to: Letters to the Editor, POB 1738, Memphis, TN 38101. Or call Back Talk at 575-9405. Or send us e-mail at All responses must include name, address, and daytime phone number. Letters should be no longer than 250 words.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

    • What They Said (October 8, 2014) …

      Letters and comments from Flyer readers — Best of Memphis, Banned Books Week, plastic bags, and Amendment 1.
    • What They Said (September 18, 2014) …

      Letters and comments from Flyer readers — The battle over city benefits, Let’s Go Krogering, and Wendi Thomas’ resignation.


Style Sessions

Strut! Food, Fashion, and Lawyers

Politics Beat Blog

New Juvenile Court Judge Looks for “Balance”

Hungry Memphis

Guess Where I'm Eating Contest 42

From My Seat

National Baseball Day

Politics Beat Blog

Jim Kyle Gets “Roasted,” Survives to Find the Moral of the Story

Sing All Kinds

Run the Jewels at Minglewood Hall on Tuesday

Beyond the Arc

Next Day Notes: Grizzlies 112, Flamengo 72

Intermission Impossible

Have a #Blessed Day

Hungry Memphis

Downtown Dining Week Dates Set, and more news


More by Flyer Readers

  • What They Said...

    Letters and comments from Flyer readers
    • Jul 17, 2014
  • Letters to the Editor ...

    About Judge Joe Brown, Gay Pride, TVA Allen Plant, the Memphis budget, and Dick and Liz Cheney.
    • Jul 10, 2014
  • What They Said...

    Letters and comments from Flyer readers ... on Les Smith's "Sounds of Silence," Shelby County judicial races, USA Futbol, and bad, bad movies.
    • Jul 3, 2014
  • More »

Flyer Flashback

Looking Back at the “Best Of Memphis” List That Started It All

Tidbits from the 1994 "Best of Memphis" list.

Read Story

© 1996-2014

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Memphis Business Quarterly
Powered by Foundation