On Bianca Phillips' post, "Citizens Make Demands of Memphis Zoo in Petition" ...
The Greensward is for ass parking only.
A responsible approach to growth at the zoo would have called for appropriate actions to handle the additional vehicular traffic generated by the building of additional exhibits. That reasonable course has not been followed. Instead, the zoo has become the playground for well-heeled donors who are perfectly happy to donate funds to build new exhibits but who ignore the problems caused by additional traffic generated by those exhibits.
The alignment of parking spots in the current zoo parking facility does not utilize the space for maximum efficiency. The plan to reconfigure the current parking lot will have a positive effect. That effort is long overdue. Additional parking is necessary.
The construction of a parking facility alongside the North Parkway entrance to the zoo, across from Rhodes College, is a possible solution. When the city vacates the current maintenance facility on East Parkway, a parking facility, either a surface lot or a garage, which would serve all attractions at the park, could be constructed.
The only thing missing from a possible solution is the dedication of zoo leaders, city leaders, and zoo donors to work for a solution that does not involve the continuing destruction of the Greensward. The current situation is unsustainable. Sustainability is one of the key goals expressed by the organizations that guide and accredit zoos and aquariums. The experience offered to visitors could be enhanced by providing parking, which preserves the Greensward. If the zoo is to be faithful to the mission to conserve, it must seek a course that differs from the one that has been taken for decades. The zoo, and the leaders thereof, must learn the art of being neighborly.
On Toby Sells' Fly-By story, "Multi-millionaire's The Kitchen restaurant promises healthy food, leads to healthy debate" ...
Well, Kimbal, we can always go on a diet, skip a third helping, but ugly goes to the bone (are we seeing a theme here?).
Please note that Musk is not denigrating Memphis, the author of the [The Medium] blog post is. And, really, how many people have seen that? Is The Medium a big thing?
The only thing that Musk says is that line about opening in other, larger cities, if not for the social aspect. And that's just good business. What's wrong with that?
Frankly, I'm really excited about The Kitchen. I wish he would open other locations before waiting for Crosstown.
On Tim Sampson's May 14th Rant ...
I read with some vexation Tim Sampson's "Rant" about Pamela Geller and her "Draw Mohammed" event. Well, at least, it started out that way before he digressed about being kidnapped in Peru, but I digress. Seems Tim thinks that Pamela Geller is nuts for doing it. While, yeah, probably. That's okay, Tim, you don't have to date her, and, no, Tim, the media has not just focused on the attackers — she has been in for her fair share of abuse. And, yes, I'm sure she did it just to be provocative and is such a nasty person that as you pointed out, they won't even let her in the United Kingdom. She may even go out of her way to step on ants for all I know. Having said all this, so what?
Let's look at the larger issue. If you draw the wrong cartoon or maybe I should say the right cartoon about the wrong person, someone may very well kill you or at least try to kill you because you offended their religious sensibilities. And your rant is about Pamela Geller? What's wrong with this picture? Where's your perspective? What about free speech? Remember the first amendment of our constitution where we get to say, write, and draw things even if it is offensive? They don't have that in the United Kingdom. Just saying.
So, Tim, the next time you want to rant about something, try ranting about the mindset that thinks it's okay to kill artists if you don't like what they draw. No one should die for a cartoon.