Paul Young (Photo: Paul Young for Memphis)

It isnโ€™t necessarily momentous that Mayor Paul Young will face a delay in having his newly announced appointments approved by the city council. But it isnโ€™t incidental or meaningless, either.

As the week began, it had become common knowledge that, upon their formal presentation to the council last Tuesday, the courtesy of โ€œsame-night minutesโ€ was likely to be denied to some โ€” if not all โ€” of the appointees.

โ€œSame-night minutesโ€ is the shorthand for a parliamentary process whereby actions taken by the council in a given session are approved by an immediate second vote by the council to become instantly effective and to avoid follow-up action at the groupโ€™s next regular meeting, when the minutes of the preceding meeting would normally get formal approval. Itโ€™s a โ€œhurry-upโ€ process, as a means of hastening the effective date of a council action, making it, in effect, instantaneous. It is employed when the avoidance of any delay is considered a paramount factor.

The process is also invoked, as previously suggested, as a courtesy of sorts โ€” as in the case of most mayoral appointments.

As it happens, the Young appointees were to be presented to the council almost a year to the day from that awful moment in January 2023 when Tyre Nichols was beaten to death by an out-of-control unit of the SCORPION task force, which had been created by Memphis Police Chief CJ Davis as a would-be elite enforcement element of the Memphis Police Department.

That fact, along with the well-known circumstance of an increased rate of violent crime in Memphis during the last year and the MPDโ€™s status under a Department of Justice investigation, is enough to have flagged Davisโ€™ reappointment for special attention.

It was clear when Davis spoke to the Rotary Club in November that she โ€” and her mayoral sponsor โ€” wanted to regard her appointment as a certainty. She prescribed a yearโ€™s worth of policy points with the air of one who could speak to their achievement. Yet there was something vague, tentative, and not quite jelled about her presentation โ€” as there was when she recapped her intentions again last week at a crime summit called by Young.

Meanwhile, there was head-scratching at City Hall as to Youngโ€™s inability โ€” or indecision โ€” regarding his naming of a COO and a CFO, though he had reportedly scoured the city governments of Nashville and Chattanooga for prospects.

The resultant highlighting of Davisโ€™ appointment against a backdrop of Strickland-era retainees left his cabinet-level choices looking somehow incomplete and provisional.

Pointedly, council chairman JB Smiley, determined, it would seem, to assert council prerogatives, began running a poll on X to gauge public acceptability of Davisโ€™ appointment, and no council members have seemed anything but resolute when sounding out on the issue.

None of this augurs well for a new administration which is still seen โ€” at best โ€” as enveloped with an aura of the unknown and untested.

It remains to be seen whether the situation reflects more of a sense of unreadiness on the part of the new regime or an aroused determination on the councilโ€™s part to assert its own authority.

Either way, it certainly amounts to a rough start.