Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Re: “Watergate II

Treason? Collusion with Russia to interfere with an election and telling the FBI to let it go.
Sexual Assault? "Grab 'em by the pussy." Over 17 women came forward to accuse Trump of sexual misconduct. Trump said he'd sue them after the election but that would mean testifying under oath.
Illegal Labor? Trump used undocumented workers for hotel construction.
Obstruction: Comey, Rosenstein, Preet Bararh, Sessions, Pence, Sally Yates, Flinn, Manafort, Giuliani.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Sputnik57 on 06/27/2017 at 6:03 PM

Re: “Watergate II

Geez, everyone in in WH has lawyered up, and Jared has very exprensive attorneys. No one in DC would take on 45 as a client, but he did ask. These are not my opinions, but facts. There are senate and house committees and the Mueller team investigating 45 and his crew for all manner of issues including obstruction of justice. Again, not opinion. Fact.

Randy isn't wrong. You just don't like real facts.
That alleged health care act wasn't voted on today.
There is no wall.
The courts have not upheld much the administration has done.
The claim that 45 has the beat brain and best words is verifiably laughable.
You can clap to keep Tinkerbell alive as long as you want. That light is fading fast.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Linda Hopper on 06/27/2017 at 5:49 PM

Re: “Frayser to Have New Grocery-Anchored Shopping Center

I don't remember the exact year the Treasury closed, but Homecrafter's Hardware opened in one of the building in November 1983 and closed in December 1985. We always stayed busy. It was one of my favorite jobs.

Posted by Carman Q on 06/27/2017 at 3:35 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

but now Toby Sells is going to know I'm the one who keeps threatening to kidnap his pets

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Kevin Lipe on 06/27/2017 at 3:34 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

Does this mean I can no longer make anonymous death threats to you guys?

5 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by NellieStarbuck on 06/27/2017 at 3:04 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

Well Flyer, you finally got my FB credentials. Luckily I was never under the illusion that my profiles couldn't be linked via the metadata.

Posted by FUNKbrs on 06/27/2017 at 2:41 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

I cannot tell you how grateful I will be to be shed of Long Duck Doofus and his 57 fake names. Farewell, you asshole.

14 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by BruceVanWyngarden on 06/27/2017 at 2:35 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

A real shame there's no snark filter.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by DaveClancy on 06/27/2017 at 2:21 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

A reasonable move by MF. It must be exhausting & time-consuming producing an ever-shrinking 40 page (?) free weekly of ED ads & reprinted articles. But how engaging will it be to only hear, "You're right!!!" all the time on this forum? Fahrrad fahren!

6 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by Long Duck Dong on 06/27/2017 at 2:07 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

and... the Flyer won't accept my G+ credentials...

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by FUNKbrs on 06/27/2017 at 1:11 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

You guys really aren't helping with my paranoia and delusions of persecution.

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by FUNKbrs on 06/27/2017 at 12:57 PM

Re: “Mayor: Memphis Situation Different from New Orleans on Confederate Statues

So my question is, where do we draw the line? I'm not advocating one way or another here--at least not intentionally--however when we start to judge historic figures by the changing standards of time, we begin a process we cannot stop.

Someone said for example that we don't put up monuments to losers. Really? Geronimo has a monument at his grave, and despite his best efforts, Native Americans lost. The Trail of Tears is a monument to a lost cause. No other president was as disgraced as Richard Nixon, yet he has a presidential library. So saying we don't honor "losers" isn't quite true.

Another pointed out that George Washington was a slave holder. Many of the founding fathers were. Some changed their mind and at least freed their slaves at their death, others did not. Even Lincoln, in writing the Emancipation Proclamation, only applied it to the states in rebellion. In other words, if you were unlucky enough to be a slave whose owner lived in a state that has not seceded from the union, YOU WERE STILL A SLAVE. Yet that imperfect executive order is celebrated throughout the country as the beginning of the end of slavery.

What if in the ensuing 100 years we discover aspects of MLK's life that future generations find abhorrent? Would you agree that if their standards change, that in 100 years it will be okay for them to tear down the many monuments erected to his memory, not to mention renaming all the schools, public buildings, and streets that currently bear his name? I for one couldn't fathom granting future generations that permission, yet our great-, great-grandchildren may be arguing that very issue, and we will be unable to prevent it.

The fact is we do not know how things will change in the future, and how what society views as correct may change. And if we spend our time trying to erase hate from the past, don't we risk having that hate be forgotten...and even repeated?

My personal preference. Leave the monument, but add to both its interpretation (like our National Battlefields do constantly in light of changing attitudes and increased knowledge) and include other monuments in the park that recognize the progression of history since the time it was erected. Don't cover it over, show it as the starting point for the changes to come. In that context, it will serve as a vivid reminder of how important it was to change, as well as how far we have come, and how much further we have to go. We might even include a monument that reflects this 21st century discussion, and the consideration of tearing down all Confederate Monuments, and why that was an important discussion. But simply erasing it as if it never happened--no, I don't agree with that. I don't want my descendants thinking a few hundred years from now that the Civil War never happened.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Spirit11 on 06/27/2017 at 12:49 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

"Lack of anonymity may not lead to less racism, I mean."

Or, it might.

Posted by DaveClancy on 06/27/2017 at 12:33 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

Sounds good in theory, but Facebook is probably one of the most uncivil places I once had the displeasure of visiting regularly. Lack of anonymity may not lead to less racism, I mean.

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by jersyko on 06/27/2017 at 12:15 PM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

It's pretty easy to register Google accounts for pseudonyms. The motivated trolls probably aren't going anywhere.

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by register_account on 06/27/2017 at 11:53 AM

Re: “MemphisFlyer.com to require Facebook or Google account for comments

Logical and sensible decision IMO.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by DaveClancy on 06/27/2017 at 11:52 AM

Re: “Watergate II

Brichy, you always said I reminded you of a really young Ingrid Bergman, not this guy.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by :) on 06/26/2017 at 9:40 PM

Re: “Watergate II

R,

See "Projection" and "Gaslight". Perhaps you'll gain, after some period of self reflection, personal insight on your behavior.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Bric-a-Brac on 06/26/2017 at 6:53 PM

Re: “Confederate Group Promises 'Swarthy Convict' Cellmate for Those Removing Statues

Funkbrs, NBF certainly sold children to child molesters, so sorry, I'd have to say you are wrong, otherwise spot-on.

1 like, 4 dislikes
Posted by Nick R on 06/26/2017 at 6:08 PM

Re: “Watergate II

so who wins this one?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ec8XZLAck…

USA USA

Posted by Nick R on 06/26/2017 at 6:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation