Anchor Babies 

Amid the furor, some context and perspective on the 14th amendment.


The latest salvo in the immigration wars — launched last month by Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina — shows how willful inaction leads to desperation. The senator proposed hearings to debate amending the Constitution of the United States as a way to deal with an issue that should be handled via calm, bipartisan legislation.

Heading into the November elections, some on the angry right have decided to try and scare the American electorate with rhetoric about "anchor babies," defined as children born in the U.S. to undocumented persons. Rather than commit to the hard work of updating our outdated immigration laws, Graham and others would seek to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S.

The 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to any person born on U.S. soil and was ratified in 1868 as a way of maintaining a uniform, national standard of citizenship — and, we must remember, granted citizenship to recently emancipated slaves who, prior to the Civil War and the 13th Amendment of 1865 (which ended slavery) were considered property, not citizens.

Naturally, given the historic circumstances under which it was ratified, the 14th amendment is considered a sacrosanct segment of our Constitution. Senators, who hope to use the amendment process of the Constitution to deny rights to fellow human beings, are woefully out of touch with the historic trajectory of this country; our citizens and leaders have worked to expand human rights, and Graham, an attorney by trade, ought to know this.

Unfortunately, Graham's talk represents a tried-and-true political tactic of generating fear before election time. Fear created around the concept of childbirth is especially insidious, and the term "anchor baby" is deeply troubling. It's a disrespectful, injudicious way of looking at a newborn baby, and the same crowd that insists on the "sanctity of life" seems uninterested in helping, supporting, or caring for children born in this country.

Graham has said, "People come here to have babies. ... They come here to drop a child. It's called drop and leave." Is this really the sort of unsophisticated, mean-spirited speech we expect from our senators?

This 14th Amendment movement appeared immediately after U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton ruled in July against key provisions of Arizona's state bill, signed into law by Governor Jan Brewer, which sought to essentially institutionalize racial profiling in that state. Bolton struck down the more onerous measures of the bill: Local police will not be required to check a person's legal residence during routine stops; immigrants do not have to carry proof of citizenship papers; and, in a nod to the First Amendment right to assemble, people, documented or otherwise, can continue to gather on public property to solicit work.

It's difficult to imagine a scenario whereby the anti-14th amendment crowd will succeed in changing the Constitution to deny a fundamental right enshrined in our society for almost 150 years. But we need focused, bipartisan leadership to remake our immigration laws, offering a pathway to citizenship for those who wish to regularize their immigration status (after payment of a fine), and passage of the DREAM Act, which would allow young high school graduates in the U.S. the opportunity to continue their education and become leaders in their communities.

We must prosecute employers who unscrupulously exploit the labor of poor people. America needs serious, sincere immigration debate. Most Americans are sophisticated enough to see through the posturing of politicians who offer little more than fear and smear — which is never a winning, or long-lasting, political strategy.

Bryce Ashby is a Memphis-based attorney, and Michael J. LaRosa teaches history at Rhodes College

Comments (32)

Showing 1-25 of 32

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-25 of 32

Add a comment



Fly On The Wall Blog

A Post About Gluten Free Strippers and Effing Traffic

Music Blog

A Week's Tribute to Jimmie Lunceford

News Blog

MATA Proposes to End Ikea Route, Alter Others

Beyond the Arc

Beyond the Arc Podcast #84: The Dillon Brooks Era

Tiger Blue

#25 Memphis 42, Houston 38

Music Blog

Butthole Surfers and Bad Seeds Salute the Man in Black

Music Blog

Soulsville USA Festival Lights Up McLemore Ave.

We Saw You

Emo and you


More by Michael J. LaRosa

More by Bryce Ashby

  • The USA: Detention Nation

    We need bold, innovative leadership on the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Central America.
    • Jul 10, 2014
  • A Failure to Lead on Immigration Reform

    When it comes to Eric Cantor’s late-spring fall, the media got it wrong.
    • Jun 19, 2014
  • Remedial Ed

    Civics test for Tennessee state legislators? It’s time.
    • Apr 10, 2014
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • A Letter to the Memphis City Council

    The council gets an “F” for its performance on the Greensward decision.
    • Mar 10, 2016
  • Detention Deficit

    Exactly seven years ago this week, I wrote a column decrying a proposal by city engineers to turn the Overton Park Greensward into an 18-foot-deep "detention basin" designed to stop flooding in Midtown. The engineers claimed we'd hardly notice the football-field-sized bowl. "Except," I wrote then, "when it rains hard, at which time, users of Overton Park would probably notice a large, 18-foot-deep lake in the Greensward. Or afterward, a large, muddy, trash-filled depression."

    • Mar 10, 2016
  • Willie Earl Bates

    The owner of the Four Way Restaurant was a man who knew about soul, because his was so real.
    • Jun 2, 2016
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation