Letter from the Editor 

In his "City Beat" column last week, John Branston reported on a new policy at The Commercial Appeal regarding advertiser sponsorship of news and features. Editor Chris Peck calls it "monetizing content." Journalists around the country — and in the CA newsroom — are calling it a bad idea.

Posted online with John's column at MemphisFlyer.com is an internal memo from CA management outlining the new policy. Here's a sample: "Newspapers are looking for new ways to attach ads in print and online to specific stories, features, and sections. This represents a marked change from past practices. No longer are there thick, inpenetrable walls between newsroom, advertising, and circulation departments. Today ... [we] understand that our content is what makes us valuable and we want to 'put a meter' on that value."

The sound you hear is that of editors spinning in their grave.

I'm not going to pretend that editors never have to deal with helping to generate revenue. At the Flyer, we run lots of "special sections" — dining guides, gift guides, etc. — in the hopes that advertisers will buy ads because the content is relevant to their business. But that's quite different than putting a logo from, say, Malco Theatres, in the middle of Chris Herrington's film column. Such a move would call into question Chris' ability to impartially review a movie.

The CA now puts a logo from Boyle Investments and a "sponsored by" line in Amos Maki's "Done Deals" column in the Sunday paper. Does the logo alter Maki's ability to write the column objectively? Probably not. But it gives the appearance that journalism is for sale, and it devalues his work.

The issue drew national attention from journalism trade websites such as Editor & Publisher and others last week. Peck responded at length to E&P, saying future sponsorships are probable, but they would not likely be attached to what he termed "high-end pieces of journalism." (I bet that makes Maki feel good.)

But why hasn't Peck come clean with his own readers about this policy? What's "high end" journalism? What's "low end"? And how can the reader tell the difference? He's got a weekly column, after all.

Maybe he's waiting to find a sponsor for it.

Bruce VanWyngarden

brucev@memphisflyer.com

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
    • Made in America

    • Into the Forrest

Blogs

We Saw You

Blues on the Bluff, Luna, Frank Murtaugh

News Blog

High Ozone Levels Forecasted for Wednesday

Fly On The Wall Blog

Dammit Gannett: "Where's Elvis" Edition

News Blog

Alligator Decoys to Curb Geese at Botanic Garden

Fly On The Wall Blog

When Boy Scouts are Political Props

News Blog

EPA Could Make University-Area Lot a Superfund Site

From My Seat

2017 Memphis Redbirds: Wisdom Prevails

Music Blog

Dead tribute raises awareness & donations for MIFA

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Bruce VanWyngarden

Readers also liked…

  • Why The Fuss?

    • Nov 17, 2016
  • Pin and Bear It

    • Dec 8, 2016
  • Detention Deficit

    Exactly seven years ago this week, I wrote a column decrying a proposal by city engineers to turn the Overton Park Greensward into an 18-foot-deep "detention basin" designed to stop flooding in Midtown. The engineers claimed we'd hardly notice the football-field-sized bowl. "Except," I wrote then, "when it rains hard, at which time, users of Overton Park would probably notice a large, 18-foot-deep lake in the Greensward. Or afterward, a large, muddy, trash-filled depression."

    • Mar 10, 2016
ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation