Letter From the Editor 

A watered-down version of Commissioner Steve Mulroy's proposed antidiscrimination ordinance was passed by the County Commission on Monday but only after several days of public histrionics. Commissioner Wyatt Bunker and six local ministers held a demonstration downtown and trotted out the usual fear-mongering. They said if the law passed, gays couldn't be fired for cross-dressing or using the opposite gender's restrooms. They said that homosexuality is a sin and that gays are trying to force their "agenda" on God-fearing Christians. And they reiterated the threadbare argument that being gay is a choice, not an inherent trait, such as black skin or blue eyes.

click to enlarge bible_thumper_tshirt-p235486815632551276qdvr_210.jpg

These folks are on the wrong side of history — and of science and common decency. Even if you grant them the absurd notion that being gay is a choice, their argument against job protection still falls flat. You "choose" to be Presbyterian or Muslim or a Republican, and those choices are protected by law. So why shouldn't your "choice" to be gay be protected? It's legal to be gay, after all.

What's really going on, of course, is the insertion of fundamentalist religion into government affairs. These folks will tell you, ad nauseum, that they "love the sinner but hate the sin." But "sin" is a religious concept which has no place in secular legislation. And there's a very good reason for that: One man's sin is another man's joy. You might think it's a sin to dance. I don't. Why should your sin be my law? If you want a religious state, move to a country where sin and law are interchangeable. Saudi Arabia comes to mind.

Protecting someone from being fired because they are gay is a simple extension of workers' rights. Your interpretation of the Bible is immaterial.

Here's what really puzzles me: Is it possible that Bunker and these ministers don't know any gay people? I can't imagine that's the case, but equally difficult to imagine is how, if they knew real, actual gay people, they would see this proposed law as a threat. Most of the people I know work with, socialize with, are related to, and interact with gay people on a daily basis. Protecting them from being fired for their orientation seems inherently sensible.

Ironically, the actions of Bunker and his fundamentalist supporters make it obvious why such a law is necessary in the first place.

brucev@memphisflyer.com

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Blogs

Intermission Impossible

Dream Home Heartache: "A Doll's House" is as Modern as it Ever Was

News Blog

Former Chef Convicted in Child Abuse Case

News Blog

Bike Share Program Seeks Director

Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Music Video Monday: Namazu

From My Seat

No Fun League (2017)

Tiger Blue

Tigers 44, Southern Illinois 31

Beyond the Arc

Grizzlies trade Troy Daniels to Phoenix

Music Blog

Listen Up: Louise Page

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Bruce VanWyngarden

Readers also liked…

  • Vendor in the Grass

    The lady doth protest too much, methinks. — William Shakespeare

    Is there such a thing as "bad activism"? I'm asking because I'm seeing a lot of criticism of the folks who are protesting the Memphis Zoo's encroachment onto the Greensward at Overton Park.

    • Mar 31, 2016
  • This Land ...

    • Mar 2, 2017
  • Who to Hate?

    Well, now we know the culprit behind the mass murders in Orlando, Sunday morning. It was the Obama administration's "political correctness." At least that was what was responsible, according to an NRA spokesperson, Donald Trump, and Ted Cruz, to name just three GOP leaders who propagated this hogwash ...
    • Jun 16, 2016
ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation