Letter From the Editor 

The saga of Congressman Joe Wilson provides a primer for how social networking and the Internet have transformed not just the coverage of the news, but the making of it.

click to enlarge joe-wilson.jpg

I was watching the president's health-care speech from home on CNN with my laptop open. (I like seeing what people are Twittering during major televised events.) When Wilson shouted, "You lie," several people tweeted, "Did someone just call the president a liar?" "Who was it?" Within seconds, Wilson was identified on CNN and his name was immediately tweeted and e-mailed to millions.

This is how fast history (such as it is) changes: I looked at Wilson's Wikipedia entry 10 minutes after the incident — while the speech was still going on — and the congressman's bio had already been updated to include the shout.

Wilson's Twitter and e-mail addresses and congressional phone numbers were sent out to millions of people. Thousands of messages were sent to Wilson, demanding he apologize. Within 20 minutes, the name, website, and phone number of Wilson's opponent in the 2010 congressional election had been spread around the blogosphere. (Eight hours later, more than $400,000 had been pledged to him.)

So many websites about Wilson's background were sent to me that within a half-hour I'd learned more about an obscure South Carolina congressman's history and record than I know about my own representative's. And this was a man I'd never heard of before.

Wilson quickly apologized, more or less, for his actions. The next day, he appeared on Fox News, where he received sympathy and understanding as only Sean Hannity can deliver it. Rush Limbaugh, predictably, offered his support. On the opposite side of the spectrum, on MSNBC, Keith Olbermann did a typically histrionic "special comment" on Wilson, elevating the man and his moment of rudeness to even higher planes of outrage.

Let's review: Joe Wilson went from utter obscurity to a household name in 24 hours. His opponent now has twice as much money as he does. Millions of people think he's a fool. Fifty years ago, his outburst might have been reported in the morning paper. Or not. But most people would never have heard about it. In 2009, we're all connected, like bees in a cyber-hive. Consequences come quick and hard. Public stupidity is much more difficult to get away with.

That's a good thing, right?

Comments (43)

Showing 1-25 of 43

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-25 of 43

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Blogs

Beyond the Arc

Grizzlies trade Troy Daniels to Phoenix

Music Blog

Listen Up: Louise Page

News Blog

Suit Targets 'Destructive' Drivers License Policy

Film/TV/Etc. Blog

mother!

News Blog

Supreme Court Steps In on Fayette Church Matter

Intermission Impossible

Muhammad Ali Meets Stepin Fetchit at The Hattiloo Theatre

News Blog

Task Force Considers Medical Cannabis

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Bruce VanWyngarden

Readers also liked…

  • Vendor in the Grass

    The lady doth protest too much, methinks. — William Shakespeare

    Is there such a thing as "bad activism"? I'm asking because I'm seeing a lot of criticism of the folks who are protesting the Memphis Zoo's encroachment onto the Greensward at Overton Park.

    • Mar 31, 2016
  • Tigers, Redbirds, Trump, Porn, and Co-Yo

    • Sep 21, 2017
  • Flat City

    • Mar 30, 2017
ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation