Letter From the Editor 

How much input should the public have in the construction of major projects? That depends on who owns the property and who's impacted by its development. Public properties should have public input. Private properties can be a balancing act.

In Overton Square, for example, things appear to be back to, er, square one with the news this week that developers are backing out of a proposed project to build a grocery store and four buildings on the south side of Madison.

One of the co-owners of the property told John Branston (p. 17) that the company wanted to "work with the community." To me, this is a good thing, because I think those whose property values are impacted by a development, even if it's on private property, should have a voice in what's being built.

click to enlarge airportgarage-sunset_t607.jpg

But what about the new parking garage/rental-car facility at Memphis International Airport? In case you haven't heard about it, it's an $89 million, seven-story structure that will become the new public "face" of the airport. It's a huge, stainless-steel edifice that will feature a 40-foot logo of an airplane with a contrail that becomes a music note. It will obscure from view the Roy Harrover-designed "martini glass" terminal that has been the airport's signature look since the 1960s.

This project is not in anybody's "neighborhood," though it will greatly impact one of our most significant public spaces. The decision to build it — and its design — have not, to my knowledge, had much public input. The design was unveiled January 6th, and construction is scheduled to start March 1st. Done deal, I'd say.

Much of the thinking regarding the new garage is laudable: It will eliminate polluting shuttle-bus trips from rental-car agencies now located two miles away. It will provide more convenient parking and a moving sidewalk into the terminal.

Convention and Visitors Bureau head Kevin Kane called the garage's design "spectacular." Memphis Heritage president Marty Gorman said, "The classic terminal building ... is totally blocked by this seven-story behemoth."

In my opinion, the thing is butt-ugly. Approaching the Memphis airport, especially at night, has always been a visual delight. Soon, probably not so much.

Was there a way to incorporate or play off of Harrover's design to blend the new with the old? Or to put more of the garage underground or off to the side? Maybe not. But we'll never know, because the decision has been made for us.

Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
    • Dear Gannett ...

    • Staying the Course

    • Taking a Knee ...

Blogs

We Saw You

Foaming at the mouth at Cooper-Young Beerfest

News Blog

New Mural Installed on Highland Strip

News Blog

Terminix: A Ghost? In Memphis, Probably a Roof Rat

Beyond the Arc

Grizzlies to waive or trade Baldwin, Zagorac today

Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Music Video Monday: Eric Hughes

From My Seat

NBA 2017-18: We’ve Been Here Before

Tiger Blue

Tigers 30, #25 Navy 27

Intermission Impossible

How Very: "Heathers" is Halloween Candy that Won't Make Your Tummy Hurt

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Bruce VanWyngarden

Readers also liked…

ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation