Lilas Pastia 
Member since May 3, 2010



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “The King of 'Cue

Chris: I used the word "amateur," not "chump," which I thought was apt (and non-offensive) since I assumed none of the testers make a profession of eating 'cue. You don't happen to know where one would sign up for that gig, do you?

Posted by Lilas Pastia on 05/13/2010 at 6:23 PM

Re: “Letter From the Editor

Packrat: huh?

Posted by Lilas Pastia on 05/13/2010 at 5:26 PM

Re: “The King of 'Cue

I just like to tease you guys. Someone's gotta do it, right? Don't take it too seriously.

Posted by Lilas Pastia on 05/13/2010 at 5:18 PM

Re: “The King of 'Cue

You mean to tell me the Flyer couldn't find anything more worthy as a cover story than the opinions of some amateur barbecue eaters? Really?

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Lilas Pastia on 05/13/2010 at 4:37 PM

Re: “Fly on the Wall

Chris: brilliant riff on police promptness. I was robbed at gunpoint a few years ago in front of a store on Union Avenue that's no more than 200 yards from the (now-vandalized) front door of the West Precinct, and it took the cops nearly 15 minutes to get to the scene, by which time (duh!) the robber was long gone.

Posted by Lilas Pastia on 05/13/2010 at 12:06 PM

Re: “Letter From the Editor

One man's cultural dead-end is another man's cultural identity. I don't like what passes for "fashion" in the 'hood, either, but that doesn't give me the right to pass judgment on it, especially from my lofty, upper-middle-class, white perch.

I don't like rap, hip-hop, grills, jheri curls, or, for that matter, mullets, tats or piercings either, but I'm not going to be presumptuous enough to impose my values on the folks who like any of those, or suggest those trappings are responsible for what ails the subcultures who believe otherwise.

Posted by Lilas Pastia on 05/13/2010 at 11:47 AM

Re: “Herenton Fears Debate Will be Unfair; Withdraws

Participants in debates, on any level, frequently have a say in who does the questioning, so I don't think WW is completely out of line for objecting to Chanel 3's choices (even if he may be out of line for challenging their fairness).

I think WW should have the right to choose one of the questioners, Steve should have the right to choose the other and each of them should have the right to approve each other's choice. I'd be curious to know who WW thinks would be "fair" to him. Jackson Baker, maybe, who's nothing if not fair, and maybe Alex Coleman, who treated WW with kid gloves during the early morning show interview he conducted a couple months ago might be two possibilities.

I can't help but think, though, that this is a ploy by WW, designed as a pretext to avoid subjecting himself to what he has to know will be some tough questioning, no matter who does it. This way, he can say "see, I was willing to debate, but..."

Posted by Lilas Pastia on 05/12/2010 at 6:24 PM

All Comments »



Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
© 1996-2018

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation