Rogue Justice 

Alberto Gonzales and Mike Nifong have much in common.

Alberto Gonzales and Mike Nifong have much in common.

If I had my way, Alberto Gonzales would have worn a Mike Nifong mask when he testified before the Senate. Nifong is the rogue prosecutor who indicted three members of the Duke University lacrosse team even though he should have known that they were not guilty. He did this not for cash or some other bribe but because of political pressure. He was up for reelection.

It is really no different with Gonzales. By allowing politics to pollute the Justice Department, by permitting U.S. attorneys to get the impression that politics ought to figure in their investigations, he compares to the odious Nifong. The mask will remind the Senate of what really is at stake.

The Durham County district attorney was not, it seemed from his record, a bad guy. But he was confronted with an opportunity. He could indict three privileged white jocks accused of raping an underprivileged black woman, or he could let the case slide, drop it for lack of evidence, and maybe lose the election. We all know what he did.

A different sort of political pressure was being brought by Gonzales and his Justice Department on U.S. attorneys throughout the country. He made sure they all knew their jobs were at stake. All U.S. attorneys are political appointees, confirmed by the Senate and, usually, deemed safe and comfy by the senators from their respective states. Up to this point, the process would make a political boss smile.

But once a U.S. attorney is chosen, the politicking is supposed to cease. This is important, because the office is extremely powerful. Look at what Nifong did to three kids, and he is just a local district attorney. A U.S. attorney usually has vastly more funds at his disposal — and he also has the FBI, the IRS, the Postal Service, the Secret Service, and, for all I know, the CIA and the Mossad. This is not an office to trifle with. It does not take a conviction to ruin a life; a mere investigation will suffice.

So Gonzales is being cute when he said in his prepared statement that he would not "interfere with or influence a particular prosecution for partisan political gain." But would he, maybe at the instigation of local Republicans, suggest to the U.S. attorneys that they step on the gas a bit when it comes to voter fraud? This was a GOP obsession, and the failure to prosecute for this crime vexed small minds throughout the Republican Party.

What prosecutor could not have gotten that message — especially after eight of their number were purged for what appears to be political reasons? After all, David C. Iglesias of New Mexico was dumped after he received a phone call from one of his senators, Pete Domenici, who appeared to be insisting on the prompt indictment of a Democratic officeholder. Mind you, the Democrat might have been guilty or Domenici might have thought so — still, this was an outrageous interference on Domenici's part, followed, ominously for other U.S. attorneys, by the dismissal of Iglesias by a compliant attorney general's office.

Nifong, a weak and contemptible man, was merely trying to hold on to his office. He had the perfect suspects. Their indictment was cheered by a vocal black community, mindless members of the Duke academic community, men-haters across the country, and many Duke students. Whatever reasons Nifong had to suspect rape turned into a huge political opportunity. It must have been hard to back down. He stuck with his case. He neglected his other obligations — to the three young men, above all, but also to the perception that justice in this country is administered fairly.

It is the same with Gonzales. His most solemn obligation was to the sanctity of the country's criminal justice system and to the belief that politics will not interfere. In that regard, he has failed dismally, overseeing a process for replacing U.S. attorneys that is rank with the rotten smell of petty politics. His victims are not three innocent young men but the trust we all used to have in the impartiality of the Justice Department. He should have worn that Nifong mask. I'm sure it would have fit just fine.

Richard Cohen writes for theWashington Post Writers Group.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
    • Invest in Yourself, Memphis

      We need to encourage citizen involvement to reinvent our public spaces.
    • Why Doesn’t She Leave?

      Dealing with the epidemic of domestic violence.
    • A Policy That Stinks

      Memphis’ decision to deny sewer taps will hurt city and county.

Blogs

News Blog

MATA Proposes to End Ikea Route, Alter Others

Beyond the Arc

Beyond the Arc Podcast #84: The Dillon Brooks Era

Tiger Blue

#25 Memphis 42, Houston 38

Music Blog

Butthole Surfers and Bad Seeds Salute the Man in Black

Music Blog

Soulsville USA Festival Lights Up McLemore Ave.

We Saw You

Emo and you

Intermission Impossible

Let GCT's Honky Tonk Angels Sing for You

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Richard Cohen

Readers also liked…

  • A Letter to the Memphis City Council

    The council gets an “F” for its performance on the Greensward decision.
    • Mar 10, 2016
  • Moving the Brooks Museum: Public Deserves More Information

    • Sep 21, 2017
  • Detention Deficit

    Exactly seven years ago this week, I wrote a column decrying a proposal by city engineers to turn the Overton Park Greensward into an 18-foot-deep "detention basin" designed to stop flooding in Midtown. The engineers claimed we'd hardly notice the football-field-sized bowl. "Except," I wrote then, "when it rains hard, at which time, users of Overton Park would probably notice a large, 18-foot-deep lake in the Greensward. Or afterward, a large, muddy, trash-filled depression."

    • Mar 10, 2016
ADVERTISEMENT
© 1996-2017

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation