The "I" Word 

When former President Bill Clinton, caught in lies about adultery, was impeached by a Republican-dominated House of Representatives in 1998, it was widely thought that the action would open the floodgates for the impeachment process.

It hasn't happened since, however, mainly because the Republicans shortly thereafter took over both houses of Congress and showed no appetite for looking askance at the misdeeds, real and imagined, of their own party's president, George W. Bush.

In this year of off-year elections, however, at a time when discontent with the president has risen measurably, even among Republicans and even in the red-state hinterland, and when, further, it seems possible that Democrats could take over both House and Senate, the idea is no longer so unthinkable.

Demonstrably, Bush has lied to the American people -- not about his private sex life, but about ongoing issues of life and death. It has long been known that the president prevaricated about his reasons for invading Iraq. That fact was further confirmed this week when The New York Times published details of a government memo that chronicled conversations between Bush and British prime minister Tony Blair. The memos make it clear that Bush and Blair did not expect to find the infamous "weapons of mass destruction" and that Bush at one point actually proposed manufacturing an incident -- painting U.N. colors on a dummy airplane and provoking Iraqi anti-aircraft fire -- in order to further his fraudulent case against Saddam Hussein.

Lying to the American public about a case for war is as egregious an offense as a president can commit. Tens of thousands of human beings have died. Thousands of families have been shattered. All for a lie.

Some Democrats have shied from Wisconsin senator Russ Feingold for advocating a congressional censure of Bush. The brave Senator Feingold was too kind. It is time for the "I" word itself to be considered.

Phone Home

We were disappointed Monday night by the Memphis school board's rejection of member Deni Hirsch's pilot proposal to try out tolerance of student cell-phone possession at three high schools (Cordova, Ridgeway, and White Station). The reason? Opponents said the schools were "unrepresentative" of the district (read: too white).

The board then reaffirmed the current blanket policy that prohibits student possession of cell phones on school property.

At that point, member Carl Johnson pointed out the obvious -- that trying to eliminate cell phones at schools is a futile effort to reverse the tide of technology, that no other innovation of the last few years dominates society as thoroughly as cell phones do, and that wisdom would dictate not prohibition but regulation of their use on school property.

Moreover, as Johnson said, echoing Hirsch, parents have spoken. They supply their children with cell phones for safety purposes, as a means of emergency communication.

Keep the Flyer Free!

Always independent, always free (never a paywall),
the Memphis Flyer is your source for the best in local news and information.

Now we want to expand and enhance our work.
That's why we're asking you to join us as a Frequent Flyer member.

You'll get membership perks (find out more about those here) and help us continue to deliver the independent journalism you've come to expect.



Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment



News Blog

City Orders Lime Scooters Off the Streets

We Saw You

Science of Wine and more!

News Blog

Election Administrator Addresses Ballot Issues

Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Shocktober V Gets Scary At The Time Warp Drive-In

Fly On The Wall Blog

Great Works of Literature as Written by the Shelby Co. Election Commission

News Blog

'Misleading' Ballot Questions Draw Ire from Voters

Music Blog

Madjack Records: 20 Years of Homespun Magic

News Blog

20 Under 30 Nominations are Open


More by Flyer Staff

© 1996-2018

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation