B.l. Cozad Jr 
Member since Apr 4, 2013


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Tennessee Senator Quotes Abraham Lincoln In His Support of Cockfighting

Merlin, you are ignorant of the truth bud so let me fill you in to the stupidity of your animal rights extremist indoctrinated ideology.

I used to teach "use of force", rifle and pistol marksmanship to security forces (law enforcement officers) and every time that law enforcement officers enforce any law they create situations where the law enforcement officers may have to use force including deadly force to make someone comply with the issue the law is meant to address.

To hurt cripple and even kill one person to protect another person from actions of that individual is a very noble thing but to advocate for creating situations that may result in killing another person to force that person into your personal opinion regarding chickens that the other person owns is very arrogant, immature and ignorant on your part.

The majority cannot deprive the minority of the God given constitutionally protected fundamental rights of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" to earn a living and provide for their families, to use their property and enjoy the fruits of their own labor over their (your) over-emotional opinion regarding chickens that the minority group owns.

If you think you (the majority) can just vote away and deprive me (the minority) of our (their) rights then "you are NOT aware that America is NOT a democracy but is actually founded as a "Constitutional Republic".

The government has no authority to play God and bestow rights on animals and then use the rights they've unconstitutionally awarded to animals to attack American citizens and destroy human lives.


There is no danger to human lives at a gamecock harvest event therefore no justification to endanger human lives using the excuse of protecting the chickens.

Understand your argument here - "comeon guys we may have to kill a few of those gamecock farmers but they're not the same as us so it's okay to rip their families apart, hurt, cripple and if necessary to even kill them to force them into our opinion because we're smarter and better than them and protecting the chickens is our priority".

So please tell us how many people is it acceptable to kill over your opinion and desire to protect chickens? 1, 5, 10, 100, 1000 please give us a number so everyone reading here can understand exactly the depths of your animal rights extremist indoctrinated ideology and ignorance.

I'd like to know exactly how many chickens it takes to equal the value you place on the life of another human being.

I will pray for you that God will open your eyes to your ignorance and your arrogance.

8 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by B.l. Cozad Jr on 04/09/2013 at 12:01 AM

Re: “Tennessee Senator Quotes Abraham Lincoln In His Support of Cockfighting

ArlingtonPops,

Are you really trying to state here that you consider that human slaves and chickens are the same thing? You're trying to equate owning another human and owning chickens as equal?

You truly are ignorant of the moronic and fascist animal rights extremist indoctrinated argument you make bud.

The majority cannot deprive the minority of the God given constitutionally protected fundamental rights of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" to earn a living and provide for their families, to use their property and enjoy the fruits of their own labor over their over-emotional opinion regarding chickens that the minority group owns.

If you think you (the majority) can just vote away and deprive me (the minority) of our (their) rights then "you are NOT a Republican you ARE a fascist/Socialist ".

The government can criminalize dugs because drugs cause a danger to human lives.

And the government can prohibit sex with animals because of the threat of diseases that could then be passed to another person from the sick idiot havinst sex with animals.

There is no such danger to human lives at a gamecock harvest event therefore no justification to endanger human lives using the excuse of protecting the chickens.

Understand your argument here - "comeon guys we may have to kill a few of those gamecock farmers but they're not the same as us so it's okay to kill them to force them into our opinion because protecting the chickens is the priority".

So how many people is it acceptable to kill over your opinion and desire to protect chickens? 1, 5, 10, 100, 1000 please give us a number so everyone reading here can understand exactly the depths of your animal rights extremist indoctrinated ideology and ignorance.

I will pray for you that God will open your eyes to your ignorance and your arrogance.

I truly feel sorry for you bud.

11 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by B.l. Cozad Jr on 04/06/2013 at 11:05 PM

Re: “Tennessee Senator Quotes Abraham Lincoln In His Support of Cockfighting

CL Mullins: - George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, John Hancock, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Ulysses S. Grant, Jimmy Carter and many other founding father and US Presidents throughout our American history have fought gamecocks. I haven't researched Nathan Bedford Forest.

10 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by B.l. Cozad Jr on 04/06/2013 at 9:40 AM

Re: “Tennessee Senator Quotes Abraham Lincoln In His Support of Cockfighting

Now the question is do the gamecock farmers and ranchers have the God given, constitutionally protected fundamental right to own, possess and harvest their livestock the same way that George Washington harvested his gamecocks or do chickens take priority over human lives and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States?

You need to comprehend that if, as you advocate here, "the duty of the government is to rip families apart and destroy human lives using the excuse of defending chickens" then there is no Constitution and you are not a Republican but you're actually a "socialist progressive" that advocates that the majority based on emotional whims can vote away the right of and put chickens above a minority group of Americans lives.

10 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by B.l. Cozad Jr on 04/06/2013 at 12:38 AM

Re: “Tennessee Senator Quotes Abraham Lincoln In His Support of Cockfighting

ArlingtonPops, What can you NOT comprehend? Cockfighting laws are UNCONSTITUTIONAL therefore the cockfighting laws are ILLEGAL. Therefore every act by government officials to enforce the illegal law is an illegal act by the government official.

It's not that hard to comprhend if you're IQ is above 60. Let me see if I can help you on this issue.

{CASE} Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (@ Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803): "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."
{CASE} Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491: "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
{CASE} Chisholm vs. State of Georgia (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL 1793 pp. 471-472: "...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty."

{CASE} Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 US 425 p.442: "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed."
{CASE} Riley vs. Carter, 165 Okal. 262; 25 P. 2d 666; 79 ALR 1018: "Economic necessity cannot justify a disregard of cardinal constitutional guarantee."
{CASE} Robin vs. Hardaway, 1 Jefferson 109, (Va., 1772): "All acts of the legislature apparently contrary to natural rights and justice are, in our law and must be in the nature of things, considered void ... We are in conscience bound to disobey."
{CASE} State vs. Sutton, 63 Minn. 147, 65 NW 262, 30 L.R.A. 630 Am. St. 459: "When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and no one is bound to obey it." (See 16 Am. Jur. 2d 177, 178)

7 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by B.l. Cozad Jr on 04/06/2013 at 12:31 AM

Re: “Tennessee Senator Quotes Abraham Lincoln In His Support of Cockfighting

ArlingtonPops, go ahead and answer the questions below. Attempting to do so may make the arrogant animal rights extremist ignorance that you argue in support of clear even to you.
Please understand exactly what you advocate and support – creating situations for killing the gamecock farmers and ranchers to force them into your opinion over chickens that they own. I wonder if you would want to send law enforcement officers out to make raids rip families apart and quite possibly even kill all of the cockfighters past and present, you know people like me and George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin and many more of our founding fathers that were cockfighters because your opinion of the chickens we own is so important to you? So you consider our founding fathers to be "sub-humans" that is quite a telling thing about your extremely unconstitutional and extremist ideology.
So please tell us all how many members ___________ of the families of Oklahoma's rural gamecock farmers/ranchers should have government agents rip apart their families and if necessary should be shot dead by these government agents if these government agents can save ___________ game chickens each year from these farmers that are trying to harvest their gamecocks the same way George Washington did as they attempt to earn a living and provide for their families? ,,, Please fill in the blank spaces above with the numbers you consider acceptable and post it here for all of us to see exactly how many chickens you think it takes to equal a human life.

6 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by B.l. Cozad Jr on 04/05/2013 at 6:07 PM

Re: “Tennessee Senator Quotes Abraham Lincoln In His Support of Cockfighting

ArlingtonPops, I'm a Republican that you advocate for government agents to make raids and create situations where they will kill me to force me into your arrogant emotionally based opinion over chickens that I own. Would you defend your constitutionally protected right to own guns (property) and the right to use your guns (property) for your own benefit (protection) and or economic gain?

What part of this real property rights issue can't you comprehend?

6 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by B.l. Cozad Jr on 04/05/2013 at 6:05 PM

All Comments »

ADVERTISEMENT

Collections

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
ADVERTISEMENT

 
© 1996-2015

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Memphis Business Quarterly
Powered by Foundation