Thursday, July 23, 2009
I-269: The Routes
Posted by Mary Cashiola on Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:30 AM
[In this week's Memphis Flyer, I wrote about Memphis' new outer loop, I-269. For the next few days, I'll be posting extra maps and graphics that go along with that story.]
The local components of I-69 are divided into two parts: I-69, which runs through the center of town, and I-269, the outer loop.
TDOT recently completed work on the $11.5 million segment of I-269 from Route 385 from Macon Road to an area north of Eads. That segment opened to traffic just about a month ago.
An additional $54 million was recently allocated for the second-to-last segment of the road, from Highway 57 in Collierville to Raleigh-LaGrange Road.
So where exactly will I-269 be? And how many exits will it have?
Here is a map of the overall area:
Here is a close-up of the route from TDOT:
Proponents of I-269 argue that the outer loop will be key to reducing congestion on I-240 (which, I have to admit, is chockfull of traffic most days), improving area air quality, and enhancing economic development. A key point, especially for a city such as ours that thrives on a distribution economy, is how quickly freight can be moved through the city.
Rusty Bloodworth, executive vice president of Boyle Investment and a member of the local Urban Land Institute's executive committee, says having another option to I-240 is important.
"If you look at I-269's function, the primary reason is to pull truck traffic around the city instead of going through the city," he says.
Dexter Muller, with the Greater Memphis Chamber, also pointed out the advantage of having a route where travelers from the south can head east and bypass the city entirely.
In routing through traffic onto the highway — but keeping local drivers diverted to other roads — an important piece will be how many exits the highway has. The more interchanges I-269 has, the more likely it becomes that it will be a major roadway for local traffic.
Currently, the plan calls for five in the below segment, an average of one every 2 miles apart from Macon Road to Highway 72.
Coming up: Does retail follow road projects?
Comments (8)
Showing 1-8 of 8
like
dislike
I remember this project being announced in the early 90's in the Commercial Appeal. Of course, it is ENTIRELY unnecessary and wasteful of taxpayer dollars, but the good (and ignorant) citizens of the Memphis region are, for some reason, either not able or not interested in doing what is RIGHT for the metro. Hence the redundancies in governments and government agencies. If anyone doubts this, take a look at the caliber of ELECTED government officials (King Willie, the Fords, and all the others we've seen sitting in the back seats of police cruisers and in PRISON).
So, until the people in the region develop enough intelligence and vocal skills to stop these corrupt, wasteful acts, this is the horriffic reality of living in the Memphis Metro area.
Anyone with half a brain can see that this new outer loop will not alleviate truck traffic on I-40 or I-240. Unless truck traffic is required to use this route, there is no reason for trucks to divert to I-269 - it's 40+ miles out of the way for east-west routing. This project and its route are entirely political in derivation and implementation. What a waste of resources!!!
Both of the people in the comments above apparently are concerned about keeping tax revenues in the city of Memphis more so than the growth of the region. I for one live in North Mississippi and will benefit from the new route. Instead of just focusing on the Memphis Metro and helping the poor folk stay poor maybe we should progress and the poor folk will realize they need to work hard to progress with us. Lets not keep Memphis dumb and continue to provide excuses for people to stay poor. Lead by example and get a job, Heck!! get two jobs. All that is needed to rise above is to work harder.
ralli, you're a little off-topic. The objection to 269 is mainly that it is a real estate development scheme masquerading as a road; and that since the Memphis Region is not growing, and hasn't been for many decades (it is merely spreading out, NOT growing) it's a waste of tax dollars for the benefit of relatively few.
It's not about poor people and bootstrapping.
I look forward to The MS side getting done, as it will knock off quite a bit of driving time for me to get to the casinos :)
well the roads and that money are way better spent than a sports arena that nobody supports
THIS WEEK'S ISSUE
