The sharp Kevin Arnovitz of ClipperBlog offers a parting assessment of Zach Randolph:

Iโ€™ve been rough on Zach Randolph, so Iโ€™d like to take this opportunity to offer a more rational critique of him as a player. Is Randolph is a bad guy? Iโ€™ve had several conversations with him, but I generally hold the position that a series of locker room encounters tells us precious little about the inner life of athletes. Thereโ€™s enough evidence to suggest that Randolph has applied lousy judgment throughout his professional life. On the court, heโ€™s a statistical beast, but thereโ€™s a body of work that reveals tendencies which arenโ€™t conducive to the formula the NBA demands at this moment for a successful franchise. Randolph was born about a decade too late, and wouldโ€™ve been a much more helpful pre-2001, before the revisions of the hand-checking rules produced a more perimeter-oriented game more hospitable to face-up 4s. His defense wouldโ€™ve been less of a liability in an era when โ€œtaking up spaceโ€ was a more essentially defensive quality, and Zach certainly does that. But todayโ€™s game presents insurmountable problems for Zach. Defensively, he simply canโ€™t defend the collection of athletic 4s who dominate the league. When his man works his way down low, Zach has a horrible habit of bailing out, leaving a basket defender like Marcus Camby as the last line of defense. Thatโ€™s an excusable tactic for a perimeter defender whoโ€™s gotten beat, but power forwards have certain responsibilities down low and, unlike front line defenders, they canโ€™t hide from those.

Offensively, Randolph is a black hole down low. If weโ€™ve seen nothing else since April 18, the ability of bigs to move the ball canโ€™t be overstated. Itโ€™s no longer merely a luxury; itโ€™s a prerequisite for longterm success. On Monday, John Krolik of Cavs the Blog composed this pithy axiom: โ€œSimply put, some guys create shots and plays offensively while other guys finish them.โ€ Randolph is undoubtedly a one-on-one finisher โ€” and a pretty good one. But thatโ€™s not what the Clippers needed in 2008-09, or or necessitate going forward. They need guys who can create for others. Even Dwight Howard, he of the so-called (and mischaracterized) one-dimensional game, became an effective post-and-kick man for Orlando. Yet, Clippers fans went days without seeing Randolph make a smart pass to set up a shooter.

Thatโ€™s our final word here on Randolph. Maybe heโ€™s capable of giving the Grizz a jolt in a frontcourt that needs a productive one-on-one scorer. Who knows?