Seahorse 
Member since Feb 24, 2007


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “"Waltz" Prosecutor DiScenza Defends Press, Grand Jurors, and Feds

What's his opinion about a DA who indicts defendants after DNA testing from TWO labs has cleared them? Nearly 200 defendants nationwide have already been released from prison on that kind of evidence--should we put them all back in jail? And ALL THREE defendants are supposed to have had contact with the accuser, yet NONE of them left any DNA? And they all passed lie-detector tests? And two of them have photos and witnesses and documents proving they were elsewhere? And the DA lied to the court? And the DA also withheld exculpatory evidence? And the accuser couldn't identify them until after a third ID session, rigged with carefully chosen rules by the DA? And the accuser still can't get her story straight (2,3,4,5, or 20 attackers--doing what, when, and where?) So why was this case even brought? The DA knew BEFORE the indicted that the DNA test was negative. And why is this case still going on? IF there was anything ethical about the NC justice system, it would have been dismissed back last April.

Posted by Seahorse on 02/24/2007 at 2:05 PM
ADVERTISEMENT

Collections

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
© 1996-2018

Contemporary Media
460 Tennessee Street, 2nd Floor | Memphis, TN 38103
Visit our other sites: Memphis Magazine | Memphis Parent | Inside Memphis Business
Powered by Foundation